Suggestion: The Bolted Birdcage at 1.22–1.33 ref

i know what scrap.tf is and the only reason it gets so much use is because it is a lot easier to use than selling it normally. Many people would say that it is not a legit form of proof either, and certainly as the only sale of 1.22 you have

scrap.tf is easier and 1.22 ref so way way hard to sell or find buyer that pay 1.33 ref for this only if they dont have much experience about prices or dont know about scrap.tf

here is 1 more proof 1.22 ref unsold http://bazaar.tf/trade/267295

http://forums.backpack.tf/index.php?/topic/3203-guide-making-good-suggestions/?hl=scrap.tf read this, scrap.tf is clearly not considered to be a valid form of proof (at least, not on its own!)

well even if is not good proof well people can buy from there for 1.22 ref cant they? so they dont pay 1.33 ref isnt that right?

yes this is true, but because scrap.tf is bot-based people are willing to accept selling for less because they know scrap.tf is quicker, easier and more reliable than old-fashioned trading. As a side note, you havn't actually proved scrap.tf has bought any, only they are buying at the price : selling=/= sold and all that. Point is scrap.tf is a quicksellers hub, where people don't mind loosing a scrap in exchange for a quick trade

well u saying scrap.tf is quicker agree also cheaper ( 1.22 ref ) agree so is better than people selling 1.33 ref and also they not quick so this item can be buy for cheaper and quick this is a best prove that this item wont be sell or worth 1.33 ref

derpeh explained the reason on the conquistador suggestion.

[quote]Since scrap.tf is a service that can at any time and day change their prices. Before it was buying at 1.22 and selling at 1.33 and before that it was 1.33 regularly. If suggestions with a bulk of their proof coming from services like this are accepted what happens when the said service changes their price?

It is equivalent to have a single seller (which has alot) selling at 1.22. If a single seller isnt considered enough proof why should a single automated service which again can change price at any time be considered?[/quote]

selling for 1 ref unsold http://bazaar.tf/trade/292572

Scrap.TF is not valid proof, they buy all hats for 1.22 so I guess you can say that something like the Fancy fedora should go down to 1.22 because that's what scrap.tf pays for it.

Doesn't really work

it was about the birdcage which is cheaper than other peoples prices i dont care if scrap.tf buy fedora for 1.22 ref

Unsolds are not gd proofie.

is good which as i listed there are many trades that been unsold which not many people interested to pay 1.33 ref for them so 1.33ref doesnt worth for them also why they have to pascrap.tf sells for 1.22 ref?

iz not gd cuz unsolds are not gd proofie :) u ned moar 1.22.

u just said again that unsold is not good proof but when there are this many unsolds thats sounds good proof

-A trade may be open for weeks, but just recently changed their listed price.

-Outpost has donators status which receive regular,automatic bumps, overshadowing non-donators

-Some items may have 20 pages of trades and there will be obvious unsolds regardless.

-Users which are rarely online, giving the illusion that it is unsold.

Iff I had rmb clearly, Vincent wrote dis.

here is 1 more proof unsold 1.22 ref http://bazaar.tf/trade/267295

selling for 1 ref unsold http://bazaar.tf/trade/292572

no, this is not true, having lots of a weak thing does not necessarily make a strong one!

so you have 3 trades showing "the entire market" for 1.22? how about a downvote?

As mentioned in the comments, for such a common item, you will have to show more proof of sellers on the market at 1.22 to establish that as a price. Feel free to resuggest with more proof.