Suggestion: The Kringle Collection at 1.2 keys

Since 1.3 seems near impossible to get, and 1.2 sales are common, with few sales at less than 1.2, I'd say that as of now, 1.2 is a fair range (although my ranges have been wrong before *>3 trades I had to close with over 75% upvote*), constructive criticism is, as usual, welcomed

If the first link for 1.2 is a quicksell, why include it the proof?

Also, links 2 and 3 are very young.

Aside from backpack.tf classifieds, which get less viewers than outpost, there isn't that much proof for 1.2 keys. Or maybe I'm missing something

first link wasn't a quicksell, it sold quickly. As far as length of time up, it generally doesn't make much of a difference, it's just showing that it is possible it buy lower than the listed price

not a quicksell

sold quickly

Okay then.

110% different in 6 ways, trust meh

I do believe you will have to get better / more proof than 15 links for this suggestion..

the last suggestion (which was accepted) had fewer than I did -3-, also, sifting through collector levels, craft #'s, and donators sitting on theirs for 2 keys really narrows the possible spectrum of which to use as proof

I've posted a trade some days ago about buying a clean kringle for 1 key. I've had 2 adds in 3 hours. Gonna upvote this. I also bought my kringle for 1 key. http://img821.imageshack.us/img821/6043/hznj.jpg

Santa is dying? D:

What does 1.2 even equal at this point? People keep switching up key to metal conversions and I can't keep up :x

1 key is 6 ref + 1 ref = 7 ref.

I'm rounding up from 1.16 to 1.2 as well, also, dat means santa stops owning you

But.. he was always so good to me.. unlike santa heavy..

santa heavy makes terribad puns on lots of his suggestions, unlike my sophisticated, sad stories about a hat that once was, but may never be again

Is this really a necessary change..? I mean, proof looks okay for the most part, but it's like the difference of two scrap.

Does it matter if a horse is white-haired or black hair? Well yes, if they want it to camouflage in snow, for example, white would be much more appropriate.

And no, I don't get what I mean either. But yeah, pricing is strict sometimes.

not sure how relevant that was... But I agree on how pricing needs to be managed like this I guess :P

Yes, precisely what I mean, just in my own roundabout sort of fashion :3 accuracy is accuracy no matter how much the price is being altered by.

Are you really comparing a video game currency to genetic traits that allow an animal to avoid predators?

maybe.. :3

It's a ref change, and while it might not be much, it's making the price more accurate

I wounder why this is not geting more expensive for xmas :s

Agreed, you'd think with all this BMOC hype, there'd be santuh hype or something, but I guess not :c

Sold one yesterday for 1.3 http://imgur.com/bmUY8RF

ok, clearly he had better options, I can assume this was via a trade server, which usually doesn't contain valid proof

trader server certainly is valid proof

Trade servers have never been used as valid proof. I bought a key the other day on a trade server for 5.66 http://i.imgur.com/s8k41rs.png but I would never say that 5.66 should be market value, nor that 1 sale at 5.66 shows that it is market value. Trade servers contain people who want the item they're getting, or don't care about profit. They can't sit on their items and wait for profit like on trading sites. They also probably wouldn't go and research where to find a cheaper one if they're in the trade for the item they want. I have almost never seen a trade server used as valid proof in a common item like this.

Got my upvote.

http://bazaar.tf/trade/375333