Price Suggestion
Taunt: The High Five!
Submitted by Faust
~1.75 keys
Unique Taunt: The High Five!
191 votes up
195 votes down
Advertisement
Related Suggestions

This suggestion was closed by neverclever.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

Let's High- Five!

I think 1.2 keys take a uncertain attitude..

so let's make a decision. Actually 1.2 keys are about 7-7.66 refineds. But there are some people sells 7 ref...


Proof: 7 REFINED

[url]http://backpack.tf/classifieds/search/id/52000ff84bd7b8fd2500001a[/url]:1key, 7ref

[url]http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/14553294[/url]

[url]http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/14557088[/url]

[url]http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/14510637[/url]

[url]http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/14564570[/url]

[url]http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/14165829[/url]

    These are selling for 1 key + metal...

      1 key + 1 ref.

        It means these trades happen in keys, not in pure metal. Therefore, you should put up a price in keys instead of metal.

          6 ref = 1 key is well-known fact, and some trades include "6ref=1key".

    Selling =/= Sold.

      If I'm right, normally Selling =/= Sold doesn't apply when you're trying to prove a lower range, it's to show that there are people willing to sell for a lower price consistently. If people don't buy for the high/current price, and you can prove that a lower range is possible, then unsolds can count.

        People throw this term around way to much nowadays, learn when to say or don't say it at all!

          Selling is "I wanna sell for this price."

          it is same that whenever be sold.

          Sold one today for 1 key + 3 ref and one for 1key +2 ref last week

          http://i.imgur.com/y2i0Nr4.png

            But many people sells it for 7 Refineds.

            or 1 key + 1 ref, or more low.

            These taunts sell for 1 key + 1 ref most of the time, not enough proof to change the currency. I'm afraid 6 links are not enough proof for a common item like this, tons of pages on Outpost.

            why not put it in keys still? like 1.1 or something like that? the prices are almost the same. im going to remain neutral for now.

              1.1 key also make a confusion. so i make 7 ref.

                ok. you do know that its practically the same just saying.


                new price and current price.

              Why not 1.1 - 1.2 ? ye strange range but will be more right.

                I wanna set Moooore certain price :D

                You do realise its the same value.

                  some people said 1.2=8 ref.

                    well, some people also say 1.1 is 1 ref, 1.2 2 ref, 1.3 3 ref etc, i guess those people are ahead of time for when (if they do) keys reach 10 ref.

                  mind fucking without need,ez downvote

                    u need unsolds at 1.2 keys

                      can i modify this suggestion?

                        no you must close and relist

                          oh my. But 1.2keys are realy confused. so idk this 1.2 mean 7 or 8.

                            the general vibe, me included, is that everyone assumes 1.2 keys is 1 key 1 ref. the '.2' is technically ~1.22 ref, but it's close enough for the system that backpack.tf has in place. "1.16 keys" will make people get out their calculators

                      6 links isn't much proof, maybe add some more? til then, Downvote.

                        but you know, in OP, there are many proofs. I took some trades of many proofs.

                          also, selling =/= sold, 6 isn't much, i mean look at other (accepted) Suggestions on other items, like keys, new hats/miscs, etc. people have Tons of links for proof,

                            I'll just copy paste what I said above...

                            If I'm right, normally Selling =/= Sold doesn't apply when you're trying to prove a lower range, it's to show that there are people willing to sell for a lower price consistently. If people don't buy for the high/current price, and you can prove that a lower range is possible, then unsolds can count.

                            Although I do agree that there is a lack of proof for this trade to be valid.

                              in some cases it unsold can be counted, both to rise and lower the price of items.

                                Unsolds do not count as valid proof when trying to raise a price. If they're unsold for above the current range, then it's not valid. And if they're unsold at the current range, you shouldn't be trying to raise the price in the first place. Unsolds only count towards reducing a current range.

                        idk a lots seller and buyer for 1 key + 2 refined Each. downvote

                          1.2 keys is everyone taking as 1.17 keys, so it's the 1 key + 1.00 ref.

                            'everyone'

                            ...

                            I have yet to meet a person that sells a 1.2 key item for another then 7 ref,though it could be just me...

                              tbh, i'm yet to meet anyone who does anything like 1.##, normally it's just 1 key, 1.2, 1.3, and so on, no 1.17's, 1.83's, etc.


                              also, funny how i was reading your comment in the voice of the heavy...

                            yus i think this is good

                              Probably one of the stupidest ranges I've ever seen ._. 1.2 keys IS 7 ref (pretty much) and as long as it's above 1 key it should not switch to refined

                                Ugly price. Not enough proof for such a well known item as well, Downgoat

                                  As others have pointed out, all but a few of your links are asking for key + metal. This item is predominantly traded in keys, so there really isn't anything wrong with the current price.

                                    Many of those links are proof of about 1.2 keys. As in they want around 1 key 1 ref. That is very different from 7 ref because the ratio between refined metal and keys is always changing.


                                    Downvote.