- Forums
-
Pricing
- Community Pricing
- Pricegrid
- Spreadsheet
- Browse Suggestions
- Latest Changes
- Unusual Pricelist
- Browse by Item
- Browse by Effect
- Steam Community Market
- Market Pricelist
-
Trading
- Classifieds
- Classified Listings
- Utilities
- Calculator
- Premium Search
- Statistics
No real suggestion has been made for this.
Taking low end for things.
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/14481859
B/O: 1 bud
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/14377736
B/O: 1 bud
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/13126641
B/O: 21 keys
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/14449137
B/O: 20 keys
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/12626721
Sold for a bubbling VRH (20 keys)
Offers to support range?? Selling=/=Sold.
" http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/12626721
Sold for a bubbling VRH (20 keys)" And I just updated the VRH.
ONE sale 2 months ago? No other offers to support the range? No other sales to support the range? No reason for highend? Terrible suggestion. Downvote until you provide better proof.
http://puu.sh/4xJar.png
Offer was made 1 month ago.
Support for the high end were the three 1 bud B/Os which is valid proof because it is lower than the current high end.
As I said before, selling =/= sold. You seem to not be able to gather ANY other proof besides a one month old sale, so if I could, I'd downvote twice.
1 month is not old for unusuals. Selling =/= sold doesn't apply hear because I am not raising the high end, I am lowering it.
Good suggestion, almost a year old price
Also, 2 sellers on classifieds for 1 bud
Eh. At least the bubbling vrh suggestion was lowering the value based on b/o's. But here you are raising the value based on b/o's? VRH after overpay would really be 19 since overpay on hats with narrow or no ranges should be mid * 0.9.