Suggestion: Description Tag at 2–2.33 ref

It means that just because someone is selling an item for a certain price, doesn't mean this should be the new price. Selling = sold would mean selling equals sold. Selling =/= sold means selling does not equal sold.

buyers comments in trades added = Solds, please see all proofs.!

I was only explaining about the selling =/= sold thing. I never said anything about the suggestion itself.

ok.. i'm sold 33x Description Tag for 2.66 refined Each. have lots proofs..

but many people if I get proof of my sales barely think, I not to increase my backpack, is not , because if this suggestion is accepted not only appreciates my backpack but Thousands .. ultimately

Where is your proof of selling x33 for 2.66 ref each, that would be very useful proof.

Sellers above suggested range don't matter, and also some proof are old.

Too many unsolds and your buyer link number 6 has an add. So it's counterproof against your suggestion.

downvote for now.

Proof needs alot more proof for 2.33 ref. Also might want to label your trades at 2.33 to be either "sold/have adds" instead of sellers.

Being labeled sellers gives the illusion that your proof is incorrect.

"owns 21"...

2 ref is already in range.

Barely any proof of 2.33 buyers (You provided a few so I cannot say that you didn't provide any).

dude check in sellers and see commenting in trades simples!

So many unsuccessful sellers at 2,33

Some actually have adds so i would write off all his 2.33 ref proof.

TEST

sold 5 minutes ago

Proof: http://imageshack.us/f/571/1s65.jpg/

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/14581024 - sold for 1.33

not see in backpack hat and desc tag?

you see?

backpack: http://www.tf2outpost.com/backpack/100408

It was just an example so many are selling at 1.66. which BP is this?

Link 1 for 2,22 not sold

L 2 for 2,22 not found

Links for 2,11 all unsold

Sorry but there isn't enough proof for me to upvote

1. selling isnt sold.

2. are you putting the price up because you have 21?!?!?

Stocking up on something that has a wrong price is smart and is a good technique for making profit. There is nothing wrong with having 21 as long as he can prove the price is right

thanks mate..

Weak proof for 2.33. It's reasonable to take out 1.66 imo, but 2.33 is not proven.

ok i'm sold both name tag and desc tag for 2.66 refined now!

need proof ok wait few min please!

ckeck here: http://imageshack.us/f/571/z4ve.jpg/

try resuggesting as flat 2 refined, not a range, not enough proof for >2 refined

sale 5 minutes

Proof: http://imageshack.us/f/407/vgek.jpg/ 2.66 refined

I agree with thunderclop. a 2 ref flat price may be more accurate.

I would agree with 2 ref flat like many others, 2.33 doesn't seem to fit into the range.

new proof

2.66 refined: http://imageshack.us/f/266/6fjm.jpg/

b/o's don't matter.

You doing this only to raise your own Bp Value:)

Also you need Solds.Not Sellers.

not you crazy? my bp is ward dude not need suggestion

And again, yNOox fails to increase his backpack value and manipulate prices. Good job.

Please learn some proper english before trying to call me stupid. You are obviously trying to increase your backpack value and make profit since you have not one tag, not 2 tags but 21 tags. Next time don't be so obvious.