- Forums
-
Pricing
- Community Pricing
- Pricegrid
- Spreadsheet
- Browse Suggestions
- Latest Changes
- Unusual Pricelist
- Browse by Item
- Browse by Effect
- Steam Community Market
- Market Pricelist
-
Trading
- Classifieds
- Classified Listings
- Utilities
- Calculator
- Premium Search
- Statistics
This probably will not get passed because people dont like when you own a hat..
But the resent pricing should be invalid because it used false proof.. He said the hat sold for a plannets dead cone and a miami jeepcap.. But If you check the items in the other persons backpack, it was sold for a planets BEAK and the miami jeepcap and an uncraftable strange pomson..
The new owners name is in the history of all the items I listed http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/14777106
The new owner http://www.tf2outpost.com/user/349643
The price that was set, however, was also not very accurate... 8 buds is very high
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/14608932 He claims to have an offer of around 8
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/13584412 Only other on outpost.. Wants 8 buds
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/14776945 was offered this BP (about 7)
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/14195246 Sold for http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/14318057 around ~6 buds as well
Oh thank you for correcting. Should have looked a bit more careful into that.
Your sale is correctly: Miami Jeepcap (3) + Planets Beak (3.3) + uc s.pomson (~0.3) = ~6.6 buds
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/13985808 Sold for Roboactive Tin Gallon (~6 buds was original price) + Strange Pomson (9 keys) + Strange PDA (5 keys) = ~6.6 pure
Well it's not real a difference if the price is 6.5 or 6.6 buds, you can count a bit more item overpay and you got it. :P
Your suggested price is fine and I will accept it now since I see it as correcting the last suggestion, again thx for submitting it.
WARNING SIGNS
1. Owns one
2. Not an outdated price
3. My proof was accurate
4. You only have one sale in the current range
5. Added me to complain about the price drop
You cant auto down-vote for me owning..
He had false proof in his suggestion which is very clear..
The price is good considering people got unusual offers of 7 and 6 and has been sold for 8 not too long ago.. THe price is right in the middle
A new price was accepted a day ago, we don't need it to be changed again. Besides the proof isint that great.
The price was accepted with false proof.. Im not good at suggestions.. But its an unfair price based on unreal proof
If the proof was so unfair, then how did he get 87% of people to upvote it?
It was misleading.. It seemed real but it wasnt.. The person based the price on a trade he thought happened but never did
Exactly my point.