- Forums
-
Pricing
- Community Pricing
- Pricegrid
- Spreadsheet
- Browse Suggestions
- Latest Changes
- Unusual Pricelist
- Browse by Item
- Browse by Effect
- Steam Community Market
- Market Pricelist
-
Trading
- Classifieds
- Classified Listings
- Utilities
- Calculator
- Premium Search
- Statistics
[url]http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/13583363[/url] - Sold for V. Medal (5.4 buds), bought for V. FaN + V. Conch (4.2 buds)
[url]http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/14736869[/url] - Sold for 4 buds (not a 'quicksell', took a week to sell')
Those are the only sales in the last ~2 months.
[url]http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/14940881[/url] - 'Quickselling' for 5.5 buds
He added also a vintage luger to the two vintage items: http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11107684
Also the price of the vintage items was ~3 buds back then so the sale would be ~5.7 buds not 4.2 (3 months old though).
Also the medal was 8 buds back then technically but I guess it was more like 6 or 7 at the time of trade.
Also 1 week is debateable if it's a quicksell or not. The 5.5 bud trade has an offer of 4.4 pure already which was declined.
Not sure.~
The bp.tf price on those was inaccurate for a long, long time - they were very overpriced, and only got re-priced recently.
And the Medal was based on unsold buyouts, so that was 6, not 8. In fact, both 6 and 8 suggestions were by me and based on unsold buyouts, so 6 is probably too high also.
Also, I'd say 1 week with only 1 collecting offer after a week isn't a QS. Sorry. :(
those = ?
yeah vintage items never sell for pure but people wont realize this and keep lowering their b/os.
how long was he trying to sell it for another price before?
What do you mean by that last line? :P
Since I'm on my pc again:
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/7590303 - was trying to sell from jan to jun at 8 buds.
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/12067603 - was trying to sell from jun to sept for 6 buds, also read the interesting convo he had with another owner.
Accepting because of this and because this price is better than the last one for sure.
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/13912770
declined: Blizz Executioner + Sweets (~6.5 Buds)
Yet again way too low. I don't get how each and every one of your suggestions is flawed. Instead of throwing out 10 bad suggestions a day, how about you make 2 good one's.
Now, my good friend, how old is the Exec price? 7 months old.
Instead of posting useless spam on my suggestions, I'd put in some time making some yourself! Maybe for the Executioner, as it's so outdated?
All of your suggestions that I have seen the past few days are lazy and flawed. No offers are included ever, instead you use quicksells to justify prices that are way too low.
So instead of actually responding to my comment, you insult and spam once again. Good job!
I don't see any insult in my comments, neither is it spam, it's negative feedback backed up with proof. And the age of the Executioner's price has nothing to do with the fact that it was offered on the VRH and it is as of now valued at roughly 6.5 Buds. As I pride myself in making accurate and thorough suggestions I can't spare the time to research it right now, however please don't do it yourself, because I know what that's gonna result in (now that may have been somewhat between-the-lines insulting).
Alright.
Find me some sales of this hat above my high end using original suggestions on hats that aren't out of date - which would be counterproof. As such, you haven't provided any.
That's because you use a flawed system to price hats. You use a small number of quicksells to justify really low ranges on hats that take some time to move (like a sunbeams engie hat). With some patience it can certainly fetch more, that way a declined offer worth ~6.5 certainly is counterproof.
Like I said, price is 7 months old, IT IS NOT WORTH 6.5. Thanks anyway for trying, and better luck next time!
hard to understand why you're so arrogant about your suggestions, considering 1 of 5 get closed.
82% passed isn't 1 out of 5 closed. Check your maths.
77.4% this month, 80.9% last month..Steady decline, I took the liberty of rounding the all-time number down as it's obviously gonna hit 80% soon. The simple fact that you argue about 2% shows that you have no excuse for such a poor percentage.