Suggestion: Green Confetti Attendant at 34.29–38.1 keys

Price Suggestion

~15 keys

g.fetti

72 votes up

50 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was closed Tue, 15 Oct 13 19:46:04 +0000 by polar.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

Overpay is applied

Sold for smoking honcho (1.9-2.1)+ 4 keys( about 0.22 buds)

0.9* 2= 1.8

http://backpack.tf/stats/391/5/35

http://imgur.com/PCcNhVw

1.8 +0.22 = about 2 buds

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15020259

b/o 1.8 buds

my trade

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/14944473

b/O 1.88 buds

counterproof and extra proof are welcomed

"Sold for smoking honcho (1.9-2.1)+ 4 keys( about 0.22 buds)

0.9* 2= 1.8"

wut o.o To calculate over-pay, you take the mid price * .9 or the low-end

There are Buyouts (included yours) of 1.8-1.9 buds, so where does the high-end come from? Even if you paid 2 buds in mixed for it

Price for the Smoking Honchos is outdated and was originally priced at 1.6-1.8 buds

1.9 -2.1 mid is 2 buds right?

0.9*2 = 1.8

4 keys /18 =0.22 buds

1.8+0.22 =about 2 buds

and 2 buds mixed after overpay.

where did you get 1.6-1.8 for the smoking honcho?

http://backpack.tf/stats/391/5/35

Look at the far right of the graph. Last accepted suggestion for it was 7 months ago for 1.6-1.8 buds. It's so old, it can't really be used as valid proof "bud are crashing buds are crashing buds are crashing :D"

Proof in the suggestion made yesterday shows current range is accurate.

http://forums.backpack.tf/index.php?/topic/4350-another-new-rule-regarding-unusual-suggestions-use-original-suggested-values/ - here is the rule mentioned in the comments above

And yeah, a 7 month old price on a hat shouldn't be used as proof since it is so outdated.