Suggestion: Strange Detonator at 0.33–0.66 ref

Price Suggestion

Strange Detonator

Submitted Tue, 22 Oct 13 22:21:48 +0000 by ★ Avery

54.29%

0.33 ref

0.33–0.66 ref

~30.16 ref

76 votes up

64 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was closed Wed, 23 Oct 13 00:00:55 +0000 by A Distinctive Lack of Vincent.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

Just proving that it IS POSSIBLE to get .66, though .33 is also available.

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/14287408 I have sold tons at .66 each. While readily available at .33, TWO RECLAIMED METAL IS ALSO POSSIBLE.

I've sold around 30 in the past month for 2 rec each. Once again, I stress that I'm not saying .33 is uncommon, but what I'm saying is that .66 IS POSSIBLE.

Are there people selling at .33? Sure. But there are also people selling at .66, such as me, and with success.

Then where is the proof of those other people?

There's a new rule. One seller doesn't represent the market and so the majority of the proof cannot be you...

Would recommend providing proof for .33 also, and maybe more at .66

Why?

So far the proof you have would only suggest .66 is the only selling range, since that's all you've given us to work with.

Also, you do not run the market, finding other sellers at .66 that are successful will help the suggestion a lot.

Overall, downvote until proper proof is provided for the range you want.

If you can sell them at .66, good for you. Profit. But that's not enough to increase the range on this

Problem is people that have sold at .66 usually close trades quickly and make it hard to find. Also, I'd say 30 or so sales is enough.

1 trader doesnt represent the market.

Puddingkip below was able to sell for .66 as well. Not many people have trades that sell for .66, but it IS possible.

Any other successful sellers for .66 ref, besides yourself?

Number of owned items doesn't mean anything in terms of whether or not you should agree or disagree with the suggestion. In fact, usually a higher number of owned items means the person is more reliable to trust since he deals with the items more often than those without any owned.

But that only applies if the person suggesting has proper proof, and not this :/

well my apologies then, i only noticed those 2 key factors in this. Guess i should have kept my thoughts to myself

http://puu.sh/4WSOj.png might be a tad old though

It's not bad considering it's above the current price, and previously the S. Det was lower than this anyways.

I was just about to do this and here you are pushing it early. Aren't you just dandy?

And the arrogance on you - only one link with a Green Belt, whoa!

What a prick.

Nevertheless..

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/8856161

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/12400453

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15001038

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15174150

Thanks for the proof as well as the insults I guess. I didn't even know there were green/blue belts until about a week ago.

Bit of a tip, post the solds ( as many as you can be bothered - screenshots from your inventory history )

Not enough proof to validate suggested range

Closing for insufficient evidence