Suggestion: Strange Revolver at 3 ref - backpack.tf

Price Suggestion

~6.11 ref

229 votes up

29 votes down

Advertisement

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was accepted Mon, 04 Nov 13 14:31:42 +0000 by Puddilicious.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

10 available on classifieds for 3 ref: http://puu.sh/57ozC.png

3 ref or lower:

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15460631

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15460520

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15460169

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15460064

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15460041

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15458754

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15458496

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15458430

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15457570

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15454311

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15449713

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15448934

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15448160

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15444437

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15444343

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15440378

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15439154

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15438283

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15435935

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15429050

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15425833

http://tf2tp.com/trade.php?trade=9868709

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15423555

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15423413

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15417578

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15416988

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15411089

http://tf2tp.com/trade.php?trade=9867395

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15408944

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15456826

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15371252 x6

unsold 3.33 ref:

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15460205

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15434041 x2

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15461521

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15456352

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15382991 x2

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/14496357 has multiple

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15381127

I think people still sell at 3,33 ref, so why can't it be in the range?

You need to proof there are no sales at 3,33 ref to remove it from the range.

how about you come back with counterproof instead of saying "you need proof" when i clearly have more than you?

Sales at 3,33 ref

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15320001 (sold probably 2)

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15422894 (sold 1)

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15177310 (sold a renamed one for 3,55)

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15346875 (sold probably at 3,33 since the bp.tf price was 3,33 then)

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15302905 (sold at 3,33 since bp.tf price was 3,33)

third sold 7 days ago, which is before the last suggestion

fifth sold 6 days ago, which is before the last suggestion

and the first link was used in the last suggestion.

I just want to say there still happen sales at 3,33, though 3 ref is easily to find

Upvote. I've been trying to sell my revolver for 3.33 but to no avail.

Downvote. This is a old strange - from crate #24 , meaning it's been in the market for a LONG time , and most people that wanted it already have it, hence it takes a long time to sell.

Also I can find you proof of unsolds of at 3.00 - but that doesn't mean it shouldn't be in the range. And as "old" as the counter proof above is it's still valid for a strange with this much selling time. Not to mention you're not suggesting a new price, but more so you're not agreeing with the other and you're trying to change it.

Unsolds are not the best proof.

if there are unsolds at 3 ref, then its obvious 3.33 ref isnt needed. just happens sometimes. ive sold multiple ambassadors for 1 key and im not changing the price because i know its not a reflection of the entire market.

and if you were to actually look at the proof, you'd see they are sold, and not unsold. i have more at 3 ref than you had at 3.33 ref. much more.

and what is that about it being an old strange? its still unboxed every day. by your logic, natascha would be much more than this since it is a much older strange.

and yes. old trades are not valid because they were covered in the last suggestion. this is a new one, requires new proof. it reflects the market as of today. not what it has been