Price Suggestion
~0.22 ref
Unique Sandman
113 votes up
123 votes down
Advertisement
Related Suggestions

This suggestion was closed by the submitter.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

    you only have 1 sold in your all links. same phrase - selling =/= sold

      what does the bottom part say?

        what does the rules of bp.tf say.?

          there is nothing to counter prove. simple downvote.

            I know what the rules say but look at other suggestions they don't have all their links sold and I have provided a link that has sold.

              sorry but 1 link dosent represent the entire market.

                well now 2 are sold

      Link #1: Sold 1, but has another one unsold

      Link #2: Selling =/= sold. Invalid proof.

      Link #3: He wants a scrap FOR ALL THE WEAPONS SHOWN

      Link #4: Same as #3

      Link #5: Your only other sale.


      Everybody is struggling to get 1 scrap and only 2 solds, not enough sales to support valid proof. There are 3 pages on outpost. I suggest closing this or find more sales.

        What's wrong with link 1, I mean they have 2 and one of them is sold why is it so bad that only 1 has been sold.

          Link #3 and 4 want a scrap for all the weapons shown, that's counter-proofing yourself. Link #1 only managed to sell one of his and not the other.


          2 solds out of 3 pages on outpost is not nearly sufficient proof you need more, this is poor proof.

        Down vote hardly any proof at all.

          EDIT:

          I have added more prove of people selling it and trades for 1 clean wep

            Selling =/= Sold. Just plainly SELLING is not sufficient proof, read the rules

              Is nobody reading the bottom part.

              I'm saying that not as many people are selling for the current price at the moment

                If there isn't any proof then don't make the suggestion...

                  if nobody is getting sales at your suggested price then why the fuck do you bother doing this suggestion? Rofl

                link #6 = " 4 FOR 1 scrap"

                link #10 = EACH 4 a scrap. as allways useless proof. why did you add for a wep each ? its already in the range

                  ok link 6 is a mistake

                  link 10 (or now it's link 8) it's just the way they wrote it because what they really said is: "each for a scrap"

                  And I added 1 wep to show people still do sell for 1 wep

              2 solds only. You should find more sales to make some profit. Because I think you trying to.

                What people want is not what they get. Or selling =/= sold. You need more sales and you already counter-prooved yourself. Better just close it ..