Suggestion: Scorching Flames Noh Mercy at 1255.25 keys

Price Suggestion

~2250 keys

scorch

22 votes up

24 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was closed automatically because another price suggestion was accepted instead.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

Kaushu gave me the green light to resuggest, so here we go!

All credit to him. :]

'using katchup's proof to raise this

i want one .-.

http://imgur.com/LaDANmA,lJTVQ5Y

"Chiroptera Team Captain (I paid 35 buds) + Searing Noh (19) + GBH Bonk Boy (15) + Purple Energy Dragonborn (6) + Ghosts Cosa Nostra (5) for Scorching noh + 2 buds and Peace Fedora (2)"

polar bear said to use original values + overpay on katchup's suggestion

heres are the values

tc, well he did pay 35, but the previous owner bought it for 29, however he had higher offers with overpay, so i will just take it at 35

searing noh 14.5 originally after overpay <- i think he bought it for ~15 anyways

gbh bonk boy(thanks eraser) = ~15 after overpay

PE dragborn(4.5)

cosa(3.5)

all of that is 72.5

peace fedora is 1.5

2 buds = 2 buds

72.5-3.5 = 69

it needs a bump up for sure, you'd be lucky to get one under 60 i bet.'

He rounded up the GBH Bonk from 14.9 to 15, so figured I'd correct that, as it's inaccurate.

He was rounding it up.

Yes, and that's not accurate. Rounding in a suggestion is stupid.

Mods have asked for that in the past.

Well then that's wrong. It should be about accuracy, not which numbers look the nicest.

lol really?

What's the problem?

.1 doesn't matter on a 69 bud hat

Yes, yes it does. Accuracy.

Either way it's inaccurate.

Booger Flames: gbh bonk boy

Booger Flames: it's 16-17

Booger Flames: wouldn't t be 16 then

no_revenue is quickselling!: I thought that too

no_revenue is quickselling!: but

no_revenue is quickselling!: mid-range x 0.9

no_revenue is quickselling!: I normally (99% of time) do low-end

no_revenue is quickselling!: but I've seen the bonk go for like 12

Booger Flames: 14.88

no_revenue is quickselling!: I would totally suggest it at that

no_revenue is quickselling!: If I could

no_revenue is quickselling!: :(

Booger Flames: 14.9

Booger Flames: WHICH IS INACCURATE

#calledout

if you're going to do this, why not value the tc at your value of 29 then

Because I checked, and the sale for 29 wasn't confirmed.

But its not 69 ;c

That's the good bit!

Insulting, prepare for a warning

It's more appreciated than insulting for sure

@Kaushu

Just to clear that, if you get insulted yourself, how is that backseat moderating?

And now stop posting useless comments and stay on topic all of you.

Not funny.

i can't get any point of this suggestion , does that 2$ very important value in 2000$ hat !

I always preferred rounding but I would let voters decide here.

The suggestion with the better percentage is going to be accepted (if the proof is correct).

That's bullshit, you're not going with accuracy, but instead the biased community votes?

EDIT - 'Proof is correct' applies only to mine, so your own statement is contradictory.

i just figure out something quite hilarious

searing noh was 14.5-18 originally

overpay using median *.9 is 14.6

and I do believe that he paid close to 15 pure for his.

so basically -.1 for the bb and + .1 for the noh = my range

I only used mid-range x 0.9 for the Bonk as I've seen it go for 12-13 multiple times.

I use low-end 99% of the time.

...

Almost all of the admins like rounding...

69 > 68.9 in 3 different ways :)

1) the number is higher

2) Suggestion seems leggier

3) >:) HUEEHUEUEU

This is ridiculous. Kaushu did all the work and you're reposting with 0.1 bud less? Well in that case, I should suggest a price of 68.95 buds to even out the range of both suggestions...seems legit.

Seriously? Close this.

I totally would suggest that, if I could! But I can't.

Thanks for the input! :)

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15642672 - Yesterday I saw this transaction and checking her , + http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15565398 Chiroptera Team Captain sold for~35 , GBH Bonk Boy -16-17 ( http://backpack.tf/vote/id/528676404dd7b869528b4568 ) - not much difference 15 or 16.

So I agree

UP+

Thanks for the support!

no problem

^^ you first have given these proof and make cntr- suggestion( with your proof) at least ignorantly

i made the suggestion first... thats why I need the bonk boy priced. also do you really prefer 68.9 over 69?

This is what it's all about for you, isn't it? 'Preferring' because it looks 'nicer'?

For me, it's accuracy. I want to be the master of these prices, to make them the best around. So good, there shall be none others like them.

But you, mere mortal? All your desire is aesthetics, not to rule the prices. Plebeian.

i already told you that the noh should be 14.6 if the bonk boy is 14.9

Did you actually read my reply to that?

Oh sorry for my mistake !

I thought that it was his evidence ( no_revenue is quickselling! ) ?

here no matter 69 or 68.9 important who it is first shown.

I'll talk about it with the admins - I am for your suggestion