Suggestion: Non-Craftable Nessie's Nine Iron at 2–2.33 ref

Price Suggestion

~0.28 ref

210 votes up

31 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was accepted Tue, 19 Nov 13 04:00:33 +0000 by polar.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

Unsold @ 2.44 for 3 weeks: http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15192289

Unsold @2.44 for 1 week: http://backpack.tf/classifieds/search/id/5202e74fba25361f0b000005

Unsold @2.44 for 3 days: http://backpack.tf/classifieds/search/id/5202e74fba25361f0b000005

Unsold @ 2.33 for 4 days: http://backpack.tf/classifieds/search/id/5202e74fba25361f0b000005

Unsold @ 2.33 for 2 days: http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15723579

Unsold @ 2.00 for 1 week: http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15589753

First legit suggestion. Hope I did everything right. This weapon is cancer - its rare, but few people distinguish it from any other uncraft(which is why it is worth .22 on trade.tf), and fewer still are willing to pay for it.

I literally can't find any sales for this at any price, see comments below.

Unsolds are not valid proof alone.

You need to prove the current price is nearly impossible and that the new price is more common.

Yeah, unsolds prove that the current price is impossible. Hell, dirty Nessies seem to go rather slow even below the low end.

You need actual sales is what I'm saying.

Find me one example of it being sold for 2.44-2.66 in the past week, or even month. I couldn't.

Then he should state that he couldn't find any sales.

Updated OP. Happy?

1st link is probably sold (not in his backpack).

Also, proof needed that they are sold on your price scale.

So the first 2.44 ref one is sold while 2 ref and 2.33 remains unsold. Ugh.

I thought thats weird.

I think the buyer wanted it to complete this set: http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15751727

Obviously.

First unsold actually sold for a strange loch-n-load, it seems. Not 2.44.

~~DOWNVOTE~~

Hey man

- Lack of SOLD items

- Lack of Items Sold at 2 Ref

- Lack of Items Sold at 2.33 Ref

- Lack of Items Sold at 2- 2.33 Ref

~~- Not enough proof of UNSOLD at 2.44 Ref - 2.66 Ref (Essentially you only have 1 link as the backpack links are both the same thing - and the items in them have not been bumped for a while)~~

Reconsidering logic and comments - This item does need to drop - no particular reason why it's not at the sub 3 scrap range; No one really willing to pay 2 Ref for it; Fewer than 4,000 items in the market - perhaps a reason why it's selling so high - but still - Over valued :)

UPVOTE

What?

- People are selling below current price, no need for solds because he's showing that even lower prices are unsold.

- See above

- http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15785392 <--- No offers, fairly new however. And if people are selling for 2, why would you buy for 2.66?

Lel why did people downvote this.

downvote what? Your comment, Terminus's comment, or the suggestion itself?

My main issue was the exact price to set :) 2 Ref, 2 - 2.44 Ref, 2.33 - 2.44 Ref, etc :)

However - the logic of lowering the price makes sense.

The thing is, I cant find any solds, at ANY price. Most of the unsolds are in the 2.00-2.33 range well below the 2.55 current price, meaning that they should be dropped down to at LEAST that price.

Terminus and Oblivion are completely wrong. Good proof, upvoted.