Price Suggestion
The Tin-1000
Submitted by ★ Dreamweaver
80%
1.33–1.66 ref
1.33 ref
14
~1.44 ref
Unique Tin-1000
176 votes up
44 votes down
Advertisement
Related Suggestions
...
97.5%
1 hat
1.33–1.55 ref
...
97.44%
1.44–1.55 ref
1 hat
Bentry Suster
95.59%
1.33–1.44 ref
1.44–1.55 ref

This suggestion was closed by Elsa Payaso.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

    Problems with your sellers

    L1: Never bumped (not too much of a big deal but make's it hard to determine if the item can be quicksold)

    L2: Poorly bumped (not too much of a big deal but makes it hard to determine if the item can be quicksold)

    L4: That was 1 week ago (outdated)

    L5: This was 3 months ago and it already sold... (heavily outdated)

    L6: Same as link 4, 1 week old (again, outdated)


    Problems with your unsolds:

    L4: Sold at 1.66ref

    L6: Has an add and willing to overpay in items

    But I will say that most of your unsolds are valid and have no problem with it...


    I hate to be the bad guy in this but not enough valid sellers and I'm going have to down vote.

    Also, no need to use profanity in your proof (I'm referring to the opening sentence)

    Avatar ★ ⛧ Ǎгᴋ ⛧ · modified

      I do not consider 1 week outdated, especially if they seem to be bumped often as Link 4. Also, yes, Link 5 may be outdated, however I still count it as valid.


      With the unsolds, L4 completely slipped past me. However, with L6, the deal never went through, so therefore, still technically unsold.

      Avatar ★ Dreamweaver · posted

        -2 within minutes of me posting this. Wondrous.

        Avatar ★ Dreamweaver · posted

          Ok, well you may not find 1 week to be outdated but a lot of moderators that accept/decline suggestions find that 1 week doesn't represent the prices of today.


          And even then, it might be higher than 1 week as OP keeps tracks of weeks rather than weeks and the individual days added to that week. What you may find valid doesn't necessary mean that others will see it in the same way.


          Also, why would you consider the 3 month old one valid (just out of curiosity). That's like me using a sale from 5 months ago for an Old Guadalajara @ 1.33ref where as it's 2ref now (this example is show why outdated trades shouldn't be used to reflect the prices of today).

          Avatar ★ ⛧ Ǎгᴋ ⛧ · modified

            To see exact date and time: Tf2outpost - Settings - Show absolute timestamps instead of relative.

            No need to thank me.

            Avatar ★ Rīkļurāvējs · modified

              I don't know if you have to turn the feature on. For me I could just click the "1 week old" and it will show the exact date.

              Avatar ★ Chuck_ Murry Christmas · posted

        Also, counter proof:

        http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15749115 (sold at 2 ref, no longer in BP)

        http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15748556 (sold at 1.66ref)

        http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15743483 (sold for 1.55ref)

        http://i.imgur.com/OWTbpub.png (sold at 1.44ref)

        Avatar ★ ⛧ Ǎгᴋ ⛧ · posted

          Current range is fine, i have bought/sold this hat at 1.66 easily.

          Avatar ★ GreenGenie · posted

            started hat banking to test this out, bought 3 at 1.33 sold 1 at 1.66 so far, its been an hour xD current range is great.

            Avatar ★ GreenGenie · posted

              5 bought at 1.33, 1 sold at 1.66, 3 for sale on classifieds at 1.66 starting now. Will keep you up to date :P

              Avatar ★ GreenGenie · posted

                I literally sold another one at 1.66 just now. Sold at 1.66 =2 bought at 1.33= 8. It's been a day? range is fine, harder to sell at 1.66 but very possible.

                Avatar ★ GreenGenie · modified

          Based on the comments, the current range seems to be fine.

          Avatar ★ Elsa Payaso · posted