Suggestion: Cloud 9 Western Wear at 46.42–66.32 keys

Price Suggestion

~16 keys

cloud 9

71 votes up

32 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was closed Thu, 21 Nov 13 03:23:24 +0000 by polar.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

*cough cough* Just, uhh, adjusting the price :P *cough cough*

Proof below. Overpay calculated. Original prices used

Sales

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/14234215

http://i.imgur.com/6R3JU2c.jpg http://i.imgur.com/ctmvT4s.jpg

Harvest Buckaroo's w/ Chromatic = 3.5 buds

Credit to jnr Mace from the last suggestion for the above proof

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15330213

2 buds, Wise told me he added some painted stuff which totalled to 2.2, but he left before he could specify or give me additional proof :( I'll take it as 2.2

http://backpack.tf/id/76561198084076914?time=1382857200 --->

http://backpack.tf/id/76561198084076914?time=1383030000

S. Kritz + 5 keys = 2.1 buds

Side note: Buds were 16.5-17 at the time

Previous B/O's

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15330213 - 3 buds

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15307106 - 3 buds

You get the point ^.^

Conclusion

So, I got another firm sale for the low-end and a 3.5 bud sale, but then the B/O's bring down the high-end. The 2nd sale is for extra support. Vote accordingly.

Help / Constructive Criticism / Additional Proof / Counter-Proof is ALWAYS welcome! >;3

it still has the same original value, and then in that case the change is too minor to be changed in 14 days

So basically you're suggesting the exact same price?

I don't see anything wrong with that.

You were allowed to update over-inflated unusual prices so long as the new suggested price isn't higher than the original suggestion. So, i don't see this as being any different.

Yes but that was before the original values rule came into play.

Downvote.

Price is not outdated, and resuggesting the same price is kinda stupid imo.

2.1 buds back then are 1.7 buds nowadays

Otherwise we should do it for all unusuals after every bud change.

So we have decided as a moderating team not to allow suggestion like this that suggest the exact same range with no new proof at all. These are pointless. And if we allowed this, we could get 1000 new unusual suggestions tomorrow of copied-and-pasted suggestions just to make the range the same.

Firm stance on these.