- Forums
-
Pricing
- Community Pricing
- Pricegrid
- Spreadsheet
- Browse Suggestions
- Latest Changes
- Unusual Pricelist
- Browse by Item
- Browse by Effect
- Steam Community Market
- Market Pricelist
-
Trading
- Classifieds
- Classified Listings
- Utilities
- Calculator
- Premium Search
- Statistics
owns one = down vote
No but actually here's some evidence:
Pure:
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15599409 - 8 Pure
This price adjusts to 7.2 pure now based on prices of buds during the sale.
Unusual:
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15550224
OFFERED THESE AND WAS DECLINED
Free willy - burning conquistador - 8.15
Hashtagyoloswag - burning dappers - 8.3
Considering unusual overpay, these adjust to 7.6 and 7.7 respectively.
The only other recent sale was to me, I got it for an electrostatic metal modest.
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15091823
On my outpost, I have been offered a scorching trilby + a named big kill + 2 keys - 7.8
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15813344
Though this offer is legit, i've decided to not put it in my range suggestion, since it involves my personal trading, and that kinda makes it an unprofessional suggestion.
1) Get some other sales, it would help your suggestion.
2) Use original accepted prices.
3) You buying the hat counts and is valid proof (You paid 6.5). Even if this is proven to be an outlier, you should mention the price of the sale.
4) I don't see any proof of the offer made to you, not exactly worth mentioning unless you have proof.
right, forgot to prove that offer
http://imgur.com/9wRtkt6
http://steamcommunity.com/id/dr_insane/inventory/
his inventory if you don't believe that this guy is legit
offers don't mean anything, you need actual sales
if one sold for 8 pure why isn't that in the range?
this 8 buds was when buds were 17 keys, they are now 19-20, so i adjusted it
so that would make it 7.5 buds so i don't understand where your range comes from
Downvote due to the bad range + bad proof + bad owns one
The fact he owns one shouldn't make a difference to a voter. Instead of downvoting based on the suggester owning one and quickly scrolling through the criticism on this suggestion, you should read through his suggestion, come to your own conclusion, and then comment something that actually helps the suggestion.
U really know sarcasm huh? The range is bad based on the proof he provided. the proof itself is also bad. The fact he does own one doesn't affect on my voting behavior in any way. Even one does own one and tries to increase the value it is alright when one has good proof.
http://forums.backpack.tf/index.php?/topic/7-how-to-create-a-good-unusual-price-suggestion/
http://forums.backpack.tf/index.php?/topic/4350-new-rule-use-original-suggested-values-of-unusuals/