Suggestion: Genuine Short Circuit at 0.66 ref

Price Suggestion

~41.28 ref

276 votes up

23 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was accepted Fri, 29 Nov 13 20:33:12 +0000 by Puddilicious.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

Don't ya just love not seeing the awkward range anymore

http://backpack.tf/classifieds/search/id/5203d61bba2536521c000009 - 1 up for .66

.66

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/16031367

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/16047323

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/16039576

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/16030775

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/16011553

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15680098 - 2 weeks

.88 unsold

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15623964 - 2 weeks

1 ref unsold

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15850592 - 1 week

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15805287 - 1 week

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15655511 - 2 weeks

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15613275 - 2 weeks

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15619672 - 2 weeks

Feel free to counter / support my proof. Vote based on proof presented, not blindly!

Awkward ranges are fine, as long as they're accurate. If people can sell at .77-1 and .66 is a quicksell, then that's just how it is

Anyway, ~~would like to see unsolds at .77~~ Upvote

No one's even bothering to sell for .77. They're already all going a scrap under. All the unsolds at .66 is already enough.

Mkay then, By the way, when i said that .66 was a quicksell and people can sell at .77-1, I was just saying that awkward ranges are fine when awkward ranges are needed, not that .66 ref is a quicksell NOW and that .77-1 ref is possible NOW.

You're not making any sense.

"Don't ya just love not seeing the awkward range anymore" - implying awkward ranges are bad. I was just giving an example of when an awkward range is necessary, not that it's necessary now, but was trying to respond to the comment you made there.

It was a joke ._.

Stick to suggesting prices, not making funnies.

Leave that to Roller pl0x.