Price Suggestion
~1.61 ref
Unique Compatriot
696 votes up
113 votes down
Advertisement
Related Suggestions

This suggestion was accepted by Puddilicious.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

"mmm mmmliekph mmmurtlephh" ~ the Pyro talking about his/her favorite animal


Sellers/sold at 3-3.22refref:

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/16317601 (selling for 3ref)

http://tf2tp.com/trade.php?trade=9934408 (selling for a Fancy Dress Uniform ~ 3ref)

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/16313569 (selling for 3ref)

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/16305194 (selling for 3ref)

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/16299285 (sold at 3ref)

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/16287726 (sold at 3ref)

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/16284733 (sold at 3ref)

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/16309847 (Most likely sold for a Soviet Gentleman + Sandvich Safe ~ 3.16 ref)

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/16288266 (sold at 3.22ref)

http://i.imgur.com/cjTSMEq.png (1 sold + 3 sellers through BP classifieds lower than 3.33ref)


Unsolds at 3.33ref

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/16220342 (4 days)

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/16299809 (1 day)

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15800472 (3 weeks)

^Not focusing too much on unsolds. Reasonable amount of solds still occur at 3.33ref and don't think it should be removed from the range just yet.


Please let me know if I have any dupes, broken, mislabeled or invalid links and feel free to provide more, constructive criticism or counter proof.

Your feedback is always welcomed and would appreciate it if you didn't just mindless vote.

    unsolds 2 and 3 are sold :)


    also, downvote until you provide proper proof (quicksells and poor bumped/unbumped trades should not be used as proof)

      I don't see unsold 3 being sold. And look at history of unsold 2.

        you're right about l3 - but still, you don't expect to use a trade opened 3 weeks ago, which has 40 views as proof. L2 doesn't have the item in his bp anymore, so it's sold.

          Yes, it's very important to check seller's backpack as item histories are not always accurate due to players that have private BP/profiles (one of the 2, can't remember).


          But nevertheless the other unsolds are still valid (are you basing them as poorly bumped because the users are not online? They were bumped just fine when I found them 11 hours ago but went offline so it's only natural that they wouldn't be bumped)...Saying that "you don't expect to use a trade opened 3 weeks ago, which has 40 views as proof" when the item is still unsold, still in BP and is regular bumped when the user is online feels like deductive reasoning...You're jumping to the conclusion rather than explaining why it cannot be used as proof.


          Backpack also takes into consideration the amount of solds (it would be beneficial to remember this) ...You're only taking into consideration the quality of the trades (quality is important however and I understand your concern).


          After this suggestion was posted (11 hours),

          Sellers/solds lower than 3.33ref:

          http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/16327819 (selling for 3.22ref)

          http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/16327411 (selling for 3ref)

          http://tf2tp.com/trade.php?trade=9935207 (sold at 3ref)

          http://i.imgur.com/4ZDt40q.png (sold at 3.22ref)


          Solds at 3.33ref:

          http://i.imgur.com/x9nxLBp.png


          4 sellers below "market price" and 1 sold @ "market price"...I don't know why you still think my suggestion doesn't represent market prices?


          Sorry for the lengthy response but this is second time I'm repeating myself to you. If this doesn't change your mind...I don't know what will....


          But at least I have your genuine vote and that somebody actually bothered to voice their thoughts.

I was buying hats and miscs for a ref each and some guy sold me one of this for 1 ref, told him it was going for more and still didn't care, so I resold it for 3, upvote.

    that would be a quick buy and that shouldn't be used as proof