- Forums
-
Pricing
- Community Pricing
- Pricegrid
- Spreadsheet
- Browse Suggestions
- Latest Changes
- Unusual Pricelist
- Browse by Item
- Browse by Effect
- Steam Community Market
- Market Pricelist
-
Trading
- Classifieds
- Classified Listings
- Utilities
- Calculator
- Premium Search
- Statistics
Oh man... this would look good on nothing
But meh, people like gibuses
Sales: GE Nappers+GE Reggae+Roboactive Tyrantium+AF Beret+Burning Bat Bakers+0.1 in sweets ( http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15648899 --> http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15733229 ) (12.1+5.7+3.6+3.8+11.4+0.1=36.7*0.9=33)
Demonflame Bomber+1 ( http://backpack.tf/id/76561198098589781?time=1383375600 ---> http://backpack.tf/id/76561198098589781?time=1383638400 ) (41)
The guy with the current trade up can ask for whatever he wants
Do a price suggestion on the Bomber first.
I wish, it has no sales on all/mostly priced hats tho (feel free to check it out yourself)
for the sake of the suggestion it wouldnt do much, I really just did a makeshift suggestion for it then used that as the value
Where do you get the 41? Demonflame bomber has no price.
I basically had to do 6 price suggestions in one for this, it sold for a miami crones, which had sold for around 41 in unusuals, what specifically they were Im blanking on, I also used offers
yea bomber is BLEH
I wouldn't pay over 16
ew
bomber is sexi, this hat definitely isnt the 80 buds min the guy is asking for though :3
hes desperate for profit. he made a bad trade and is regretting it
Gonna stick strongly to our two defined sales to price new hats. I know this makes it tough on these high tier unpriced hats that just keep selling for other unpriced hats.
Setting prices on these hats have a huge impact, if incorrect, to the owners of the hats. While all our prices are estimates, discrepancies get magnified at this scale. When pricing these kinds of hats it's all the more important to make sure every hat is defined in value to give strong backing to the suggested range.
Bomber will need to have an established price first before using it as proof here.