Suggestion: Non-Craftable Nanobalaclava at 0.33–0.66 ref

Price Suggestion

~15 ref

1255 votes up

256 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was closed Sat, 28 Dec 13 07:16:46 +0000 by An Average NTR Enjoyer.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

Only 1 page and a few on outpost and some are painted...

Sellers .33 - .66

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/16583974 - 0.33 - 0.66

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/16510362 - 0.33

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/16585016 - Paying 6.22 + unc. nano for a key (nanobalaclava counting at 0.33 - 0.55)?

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/16586721 - selling for 0.66

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/16364558 - 0.66

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/16558478 - sold 0.66

Unsolds @1.00

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/16328737 - 1 week

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/14822712 - 2 months (outdated but well bumped)

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/16463408 - 4 days

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15404216 - Unsold 1 month , got offered 0.66

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/16362309 - Unsold 1 week , poorly bumped

http://i.imgur.com/n2s5jBm.png - 1 + crap

hmm.... Let me see your outpost trade?

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/16202479

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/16449415

hm.. you take 2 weeks to sold it . And that second link is in my range...

Notice how I'm selling it for 1.33 ref. It's obvious when you try to sell for 1.33 ref it's going to take slow. That second link also is within the current range.

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/14822712 - 1 (x2)

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/16449415 - 0.66

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/16016100 - 1.11

http://i.imgur.com/n2s5jBm.png - 1 + crap

Offers arent outdated.

1st - outdated

2nd - you already showed this trade

3rd - outdated too

4th - you already showed this sale

Don't question Asphalts authority on dirty hats.

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/16619450 - selling @0.66

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/16589277 - selling @1.00 , unsold 2 days

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/13385437 - Buying for 0.33 , 1 added and 1 guy asking for 0.66 (painted greed) - the trade is outdated , unfortunately ;/

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/16449415 - 0.66

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/14822712 - 1 (x2)

http://tf2tp.com/trade.php?trade=9952262 - 1

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/16164568 - 1

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/16016100 - 1.11

http://i.imgur.com/n2s5jBm.png - 1 + crap

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/16026892 - 2 (painted)

There is no reason for 0.33. I've given more links for 1 ref then you have for 0.33 ref.

Meaning your price range is less accurate then the current one (even though it probably could use an update).

Yes , you give many links for 1 ref , but just this - http://tf2tp.com/trade.php?trade=9952262 is valid , the rest are outdated .

http://i.imgur.com/n2s5jBm.png - 1 + crap etc... -- Outdated? No.

And just found another link yet again: http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/16231726 - 1

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/16202479 - You sold (the same as the screenshot) - outdated , this second link - outdated

I still cannot understand why you put the same links once you already posted them.

It's better in my opinion when all the counter-proof is gathered in 1 comment then if it's shattered over multiple comments. Makes the work who will check this easier imo.

I agree, but i would do that when i have a lot of proof and do that 1 at a time on a vote.

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/16636868 - 0.66

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/16663748 - 1

http://i.imgur.com/n0ds5z0.png - 1

proof is quite rusty, counterproof looks solid, i will downvote

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/16531588 - bp.tf prices , unsold 6 days , got offered 0.33

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/16657815 - 1.00 , unsold 3 days

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15404216 - 1,00 , unsold 1 month . Got offered 0.66

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/16710957 - 1, sold

And more counter-proof. *sigh*

I have bought a few of these for a reclaimed each. Price works for me.

Can you add the links then please?

.33 is bought immediately (by asphalt or someone), and there is counterproof that 1 ref is still possible. Going to have to close this...