- Forums
-
Pricing
- Community Pricing
- Pricegrid
- Spreadsheet
- Browse Suggestions
- Latest Changes
- Unusual Pricelist
- Browse by Item
- Browse by Effect
- Steam Community Market
- Market Pricelist
-
Trading
- Classifieds
- Classified Listings
- Utilities
- Calculator
- Premium Search
- Statistics
Still trying to fix a first value:
Low end proof: http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/16233435
High end proof: http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/16624326
(Quicksell: http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/16116905
Without Proof: sold for circling heart tippler's tricorne)
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/16624326
Desert Maurader price is 9 months old, not the strongest piece of evidence.
That should be updated first I believe.
Sale #1 (Low end):
Buds were 17 - 17.5 keys at the time, making 21 keys ~1.2
Total Sale: ~2.2
Sale #2 (High end):
TF Logo Marauder price is 9 months old, invalid proof
Even if we use it as proof, original price is 1.5 - 1.9, ~1.5 after overpay
Total Sale (IF valid, it's not): ~2.5
Circling Heart Trippler's Tricorne original price is 2 - 2.3, ~1.9 after overpay
Considering your high end is based on 1 sale when most of it is a 9 months old priced hat, I wouldn't say it's exactly acceptable
Even if it was acceptable, both of your sales are a bit off (2.2 instead of 2.3 and 2.5 instead of 2.7)
And for last, your unproved sale is actually below your low end
Your quicksell link is indeed a quicksell though
Anyways your range cannot be 2.3 - 2.7
As indicated, the logo marauder needs to be priced first since it has an ancient price. And the tricorne would be 2 after overpay.
You do have the 2.2 pure sale. If you provide proof of the tricorne sale, a range of 2-2.2 may be reasonable. Or you can price the marauder first and base a range around that and the pure sale. As is, insufficient evidence for the high end.