Price Suggestion
~595 keys
searing
Unusual Soldier's Stash Searing Plasma
132 votes up
50 votes down
Advertisement
Related Suggestions

This suggestion was closed by the submitter.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

Counter-suggestion: http://backpack.tf/vote/id/52be95194dd7b89d7d8b456b -

Original values of unusuals used and overpay applied when necessary. Buds priced at what they were time of sale


Proof #1


http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/16504400

Sold for: Bliz Tree (~2.9) + Bliz Western Wear (~0.8) + 16 keys pure (~0.9) + .2 (0.2) in sweets

Wear, http://backpack.tf/stats/379/5/30 (7 months) Tree, http://backpack.tf/stats/341/5/30 (7 months)


Total: ~4.8 buds - Both unusuals in the trade have outdated prices. Original prices may not reflect what they currently sell for.


Proof #2


http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/16498306

Sold for: Purple Energy Bombing Run (~2.1) + Peace Sign Goggles (~1.2) + S.F. Sniper Rifle (~1) + .3 in sweets (0.3)

Bombing, http://backpack.tf/stats/249/5/10 Goggles, http://backpack.tf/stats/177/5/18


Total: ~4.6 buds


Conclusion


First sale has 2 very outdated prices of the unusuals that were exchanged, which I stated and explained above. Both weren't updated since 7 months ago, and are therefore not valid. This has set back unusual price suggesters before, it shouldn't stop now. Second sale is valid, with both unusuals being priced no more than 3 months ago for each. Remember, I have calculated overpay by doing the mid-price of the unusual * 0.9, which is how mods/admins like it. Any Extra Proof/Cunter-Proof/Opinions/Tips/Help is all welcome. Thanks for reading. Feedback is always appreciated.

    Your proof seems to be for 4.6 buds, while your suggestion is 4.4 buds. I think you have failed to account for the recent bump in buds price, which amuses me greatly. At least put a range.

      Buds rose in price, lowering this. I made this 5 days ago. Buds rose 2 days ago. How is that "amusing"?

      When buds rise/drop, unusual suggestions and prices drop/rise.

        It's amusing to me that you seemed to put the proof as 4.6, while the suggestion is 4.4