Suggestion: Strange Spy-Cicle at 2.33 ref

60726 strange spy cicle currently exists dont think 200 is even %50 of market and reason why they get rare is not coz i own 116 is coz killstreak any way ur choice

But only 8 pages on outpost, which comes out to about 6 pages of legit sellers

20 trades per page right? That's 120 s. spy-cicles+. I said market, not in the whole world.

The fact that you're using alts to do this stuff makes you avery #2. http://backpack.tf/u/76561198108819175

ask admin or who ever i didnt use my other account to vote on them twice or trick u guys and i dont know how but ask one of them admin to see on which of the suggestion that i made with my other account i upvote or even vote i didnt well coz i knew thats like voting for my self seems wierd also the reason why i used my other account is coz i i was using the other more than this why? coz i was using that one more for buying items and was running out of space on this one also if u think i used my other account so no-one can notice that i own that much well dont u think i could put them on my alt account and make it private so no one can see ? and when u saying 8 page on outpost i didnt freaking buy all these cicles at once so u saying i bought half of the market also i dont have that much metal to buy +100 cicle at once check my bp history and see how long do i have these spy-cicles and outpost which u saying i bought half of it then why the trades are still open? and check all these links and tell me which one i bought it check it first then say it

also tf2wh owns 26 and i didnt even buy one spy-cicle from there not at all

and here is another example bought around 36 strange persian and outpost has 9 page seller well u think i bought 30% of the market ? nope.avi i bought them only from 1 user http://prntscr.com/2j7yi5

and got around 50 left and i might get them later just wanted to say that +100 is not half of the market and how ever most of my stranges that u see is in bulk i always buy them from some unboxer and they only need metal fast so they unbox again dunno why but they love to unbox and i love to buy them too so ye 100 cant be always half of the market some times can be from 1 or 2 user too

Many people are blind voting again both goes to negatives(those who sees how many you own) and to positive mostly(They just see the wall of proof and upvote)

You have to show 2 ref isn't possible and almost many of your buyers for 2 ref bought one.

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17150827

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17149901 --> 1 person was willing to sell

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17149145

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17144085 --> Bumped his/her trade only once within 6 days of posting.

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17127989

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17107240

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17175191

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17171989

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17159998

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17155126

So basically you are counter-proofing yourself.

Hmm...

1 more successful buyer at 2 ref recently (only 14 hours old)

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17283659

----------

Another one.

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/12756236 --> 2 willing sellers at 2 ref. 1 was 3 days ago, another one was about a week ago.

Classic 2+2

Edit: actually read the proof, upvote.

No offense, did you see the successful 2 ref buyers? He is basically giving counter-proof against his own suggestion.

As far as what I have seen on bp.tf you have to show that the current range is not possible to buy when raising a price. In this case, he was suppose to show 2 ref isn't possible.

Ok, now THIS will appear on the home page. I am completely sure about it.

I'll most likely be wrong as always but I have a good feeling about this one. :D

Dude, stop manipulating. I farted up btw.

I sharted, up vote from me. btw nice alt

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17238937

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17212809

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17211207

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17207474

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17204195

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17197110

2ref sells fast, even if it is you buying a good chunk of them <3 upvote

Can't we just call him 4 since that's what 2 + 2 is?

I HAVE BEEN LIED TO MY WHOLE LIFE. I thought 2+2 = 22 :(

wait is he trying to say that it aint 22?

Seriously though, a lot of your 2 ref buyers bought them, why are you eliminating 2 ref when buyers can still get them for 2 ref easily?

You're also eliminating everything from 2 ref to 2.33 ref, you have to show that 2 ref isn't possible.

with those buyers at 2 ref tells that 2 ref going soo easy atleast go outpost and if u can search and see how many seller u can find at 2 ref that bumped good and is not sold fast in this suggestion im showing how easy 2 ref go and in classified the only 2 ref seller sold too fast

So you have to eliminate 2.11 and 2.22 as well? I'm talking about how easy it is to buy them for 2 ref each, since the majority of your buyers bought them easily.

buyers most of them getting easily why coz coz some sellers prefer pure more but when many people trying to buy at low range and there are rarely afew sellers at low end range that either sold fast or if didnt sold bumped poorly or owner offline for a while when low range getting more common price for quickbuyers too i dont see any point low end stay in range

That hardly makes any sense, if you're increasing the price, you have to prove that you can't get it for 2 ref each. Also what happened to 2.11 and 2.22?

That ~~hardly~~ u might didnt understand very well but i explained wellmakes any sense

if you're increasing the price, you have to prove that you can't get it for 2 ref each. Also what happened to 2.11 and 2.22? . nope any thing buying for under market price is possible isnt it? and for removing the low range we need to proof that is sell quickly and fast at low range price

R.I.Pizza english, any item can sell quickly, just because you show that you try to buy as many s. spy-cicles to control the market. Doesn't mean that it sells quickly, even if it did, it doesn't matter, because mostly all of your buyers at 2 ref have bought them. Just because you put a wall of proof up doesn't mean that you're going to get this suggestion to pass. Just about all of your buyers bought them for 2 ref like I said. You're supposed to show that 2 ref isn't possible, which it clearly and easily is.

i didnt buy many cicles to control the market how ever i bought them mostly in a bulk but any way i dont see any seller at 2 ref that not sold easily also those buyers even is success full is coz most people prefer metal than item more i told u that before as well and instead of showing some seller at low range that not sold yet and bumped good u keep saying that buyers bought which i said already buying item under market price is always possible but all those buyers at low end price and all those Quicksales at low end price tells 2 ref going too fast and there is no point to stay in range

Dunno Why I can't reply to your last comment but I will answer here.

------

You haven't shown 2 ref isn't possible but what you have shown is that 2 ref is still possible Those aren't quickbuyers if they are buying at market price I have no choice but to completely agree with Barack on this one.

Agreed. I checked as well. Many of his buyers successfully bought it for 2 ref.

You are one of the few person who here actually checks the proof thoroughly. Thanks for being a side kick :P

I always love checking many of the suggestions here given at hardcore mode. Always feels good to have another person doing the same. He has major flaws in his suggestion.

He's already gradually upped the value by .66 ref. If this suggestion is passed, that .66 increase will be solid, and he can sell them to make a .77-.99ref profit, just by making these suggestions. I don't know about everyone else, but I'm giving this one a downvote.

It's not about the profit that matters, or that he owns a ton, or that he buys them before anyone else.

It's that almost all his buyers were able to get them quick or easily. In order for suggestions to raise the price of an item, it needs to provide proof that the previous price isn't possible.

doesn't matter, as long as the fellow has legit proof

That's true, but in the spirit of trading, isn't this kind of screwing over the system?

could think about it this way, the guy is obviously a big spy cicle trader, so he'd know how the market is on them

nahhhh.

I think you want to make profit.You have 116

Nah, You're just a dumb fuck who can't see the fucking proof.

http://backpack.tf/vote/id/52bd08d84dd7b8aa0a8b4568

http://backpack.tf/vote/id/52bb3c1b4dd7b87a1c8b4568

'nuff said

you own 116 of this?

no he dont, hello blind

Dem owns m8

Guys lay off this guy, just because he owns a lot does not mean he is bad. His proof defined by the bass amounts of links posted is enough, he's not trying to raise his bp value, he showed that when he dropped the prices on some items he had in large quantity.

http://backpack.tf/vote/id/52bb3c1b4dd7b87a1c8b4568

That's just a link of some past work of him dropping the price on paint which he owned 75 of. Anybody could have, but he chose to.

you have my vote sir.