Price Suggestion
~300 keys
moon
Unusual Stout Shako Cloudy Moon
93 votes up
14 votes down
Advertisement
Related Suggestions

This suggestion was closed by polar.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

Stout Shako Fer 2 Reeeeefined! More like 4.5-5.5buds


http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/16107599

-sold for scorching mountain cap and a bud was added to the shako. 4~ Outlier :http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/16746919


Looks like it sold with a c bubbles wraith wrap and 1 bud for a GE milk+Burn hallmark

http://www.tf2outpost.com/user/36232

10+shako+1 for 11.5+4 Shako=4.5


Sold it for a scorching bicorn 4.5 was added.

10-4.5=5.5

http://www.tf2outpost.com/user/255840


Ye, 10 month old price russian looking moon hat needs a drop pls.

    Couldn't find anything in that first trade mentioning a shako AT ALL, the last link didn't have any notes saying he specifically sold the shako for the bicorne, and the second one is yet another comment digging chore that I couldn't be bothered to go through. Next time, don't make us have to spend 15 minutes digging around in three links and just link to the post where the hat was traded, and tell us which offer was accepted. Downvote from me for sloppy and thus potentially inaccurate proof.

      Wtf? Do the research and put in a little effort. The shako+1 sold for the mountain cap. Your the only one who had to do 15 mins of research. Down voting for "Sloppy proof" and "Potentially" Inadequate proof? is bull shit. I asked shablagoo the guy who sold the the bicorn for the shako. My bad for not getting a screen, but the rest of the proof is accurate...

        CTRL-F yields no results when searching for keywords "shako", "stout", "cloudy", "moon", or "cm" at all in the shako+1 trade, and a manual search yields absolutely no mention of a shako as well. The only thing I see related to a CM shako at all is mentioned in the OTHER trade, which he is selling, but doesn't say where he got it from and for how much. Your proof IS sloppy because we have to go out of our way (had to go back three pages in that third trader's history to even find the trade) to find the non-existent proof you say is in those links, and in addition you even admit to forgetting to provide a screencap of the last one, something that is NEEDED since we can't find proof of that trade otherwise. THAT is sloppy, I do not bullshit you. If your proof is accurate, don't be lazy and tell us EXACTLY where to find said proof in the links. Hunting isn't our job, you took that upon yourself.

          You downvote my retort but don't respond? That's the equivalent of saying "I'm right, you're wrong," and I don't appreciate your passive-aggression. The bottom line is that I can't find any offer/comment in any of the trades that supports your claims. Give me direct screenshots of your proof, as I seem to be missing it, and I'll concede.

            never disliked it.

              YOU WIN THIS TIME, DINKLEBERG

    Thanks for the suggestion. Unfortunately the range here is all based on some less than solid proof. The scorching bicorne has a 4 month old price and the multi-hat trade just shouldn't be used as evidence. It's just not reliable to price a small piece of a large trade of 4 hats, even if we assume accurate pricing on all other hats involved. In this case, they are hardly accurate with the cauldron wraith at 5 months old