Suggestion: Antlers at 1.77–1.88 ref

Price Suggestion

Antlers

Submitted Thu, 30 Jan 14 04:41:23 +0000 by ★ Bob

91.95%

1.77–2 ref

1.77–1.88 ref

~1.5 ref

240 votes up

21 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was closed Fri, 31 Jan 14 21:24:01 +0000 by A Distinctive Lack of Vincent.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

~~Ugly ranges ftw~~

1.77 ref

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17575857

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17595912

1.88

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17588223 - appears to have sold

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17416475

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17605033

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17531742

2 ref unsolds

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17360253 - 11 days

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17418526 - 9 days

Proof from previous suggestion

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17379971 (1.66) - sold

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17503832 (1.66) - sold

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17493179 (1.77) - not sold (4 days)

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17225734 (1.88) - 1 week

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17472832 (1.88) - not sold, relisted on http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17569724

~~http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17516098 (1.88)~~ - relist of above

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17416475 (1.88) - not sold (9 days)

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17443672 (1.88) - sold but lvl 99

P.S. Not sure if I should suggest 1.77 instead

It sells for 2 ref:

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17602115

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17586865

don't know how much first link sold for

Hmm saw it as 2 ref when i was checking trade.tf :\

Yeah, you should do a screenshot of trade.tf in those cases. Anyway, neutral for now.

I sold mine for 1.88 http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17270923

Nice, what i needed for a upvote!

The only relevant proof here is the 2 ref unsolds, as 1.77-1.88 is already in range. In that regard, the provided proof is minimal- a depiction of only two sellers on the 5 pages available on outpost. Of the provided unsolds, one is no longer up for trade. Stealth meanwhile has provided counterproof of one solid sale at 2 ref.

All in all, for a change this minor, the proof should be definitive. That is just not the case here- minimal proof in the form of two unsolds, one of which had stopped selling an undeterminite amount of time ago and with one solid link countering them. The proof just does not validate the suggested change well enough. Closing.