Suggestion: Ground Control at 6–7 ref

There are many more unsolds at 1 key but poorly bumped, so i did not include them here. However, since 1 key is still possible, it is still in the range.

There are a few 5.33 refs on backpack.tf but don't think that it is solid enough to rule it out as not a quicksale.

Looking as there are quite a number of 6 refs sellers and doesn't seem like its a quicksale, suggesting to include it as the low end.

Don't know why people do this. You put it in the wrong currency. It should be in keys.

It should be... 0.9 - 1 key

7 ref = 1 key

If you don't re-suggest then I would have no choice but to counter-proof you just like I did a day ago with the same situation.

Decelerating the speed of the boat. :(

0.9 key = 6.3 refs. How is that more accurate? As you said 7 ref = 1 key. Go ahead and counter suggest if you wish, pretty sure 6 refs =/= 0.9 keys.

Then 0.82, though the range will seem ugly, you would have to price it in keys because when a price like this gets accepted it creates arguments between traders. Some will say I will pay you a key and you return a reclaimed back while others will be realistic and say key is 7 ref and you can easily get it. That is why I am saying to price it in keys :P

Well, the backpack.tf price for keys is 7 refs. Suggestions are suppose to follow the latest updated price of the item as far as i know. (Correct me if i'm wrong). I don't think creating arguments between traders is a legit reason that influence how an item should be priced whether in keys or metals. They should be smart enough to know that the current price of keys is 7 refs.

"Smart" enough is the right word here and I completely agree with you but unfortunately more than half of Tf2 traders aren't what you are telling. Bp.tf price are to tell people that this is the guide for you, you use it but when price like this gets accepted most/many players tries to get as much advantage they can.

Example:

A player adds you and says this:

"I pay key you pay back 1 scrap/2 scrap back cause keys are worth 7.11/7.22 can't get keys for 7 ref."

Another foul user adds you and says this:

""I pay key you pay back 0.33 back cause keys are worth 7.33 ref, you can't get keys for 7 ref."

...And then a whole debate starts and both of the users time are wasted. Happened tons of times and still happens. If you are regular to trading you would definitely know this.

In reality it is extremely easy to get keys for 7 ref at the moment but no that user will stick to their words cause thats what they believe.

So yeah, this is why I am saying to price it in keys since you added the high end 7 ref. Hope you understood now :P

You really need some more solds at 6 ref. Neutral for now.

He doesn't need solds at 6 refs. If it shows that 6 refs sells alot and fast, then his suggestion is just countering itself. Sellers are fine, good suggestion. May need more sellers at 6 refs that aren't young though.

Well yeah. I decided that 6 refs was fine because in backpack.tf, most of them are 1 day - 3 days old.

solds are for raising :P

I really don't think only 1 sold at low end really justifies it being the range so I think more proof would be necessary, what about quick sells? - Neutral

Umm, this is lowering the price. You only need sellers at a lower price and preferably not getting sold in a short amount of time to show that it is not quicksale.