Suggestion: Blizzardy Storm Baron von Havenaplane at 29.25–42.9 keys

Price Suggestion

~25.5 keys

blizz

24 votes up

21 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was closed Sun, 16 Feb 14 14:18:09 +0000 by the submitter.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

Everyone loves collecting high values :D

So lets get the boringness linky stuff started, shall we?

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17591247

(Sold for Peace sign noble 2.4 buds)

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17573242

(Australium FL for it 1.6 I think)

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17433966

(NnB Bonk Boy 1.8)

Thats all the proof I have. If you want me to go and find some more, just ask :D

In what world would you take the high-end of an unusual sale?

And does the Flamethrower even have a price?

N&B Bonk Boy is duped

There is a thing called pricechecking. You look at what offers things are getting even if they aren't priced by BP.TF

The bonk boy recieved higher offers than 1.6 anyway.

Thanks for feedback though :D

Lets see here, your N&B Bonk Boy is too old to be used as a stable price, you didn't even calulate overpay on it with original prices. It's 1.5 with overpay calculated seeing as how N&B is 1.5-1.9.

Aus Flamethrower with overpay is 1.6

And the Peace Sign Noble is 1.8. You really need to put actual effort into making these.

Hey, it's my first one ;-;

I kinda screwed it up I'll redo it

Price an item on backpack.tf, you go by backpack.tf price and rules. End of story.

The Bonk Boy is duped and has a 6-month outdated price. Not valid proof

For completing what Pyhton said, you have to take original values of the offered hat and apply 0.9 factor on it.

For the Noble, it makes 2.65*0.9 = 2.4 buds, so outside from your suggested range.

For the Strange Unu. Bonk (maybe adds 2 keys to the 1.7 buds original value so makes 1.8 buds), the offered hat is the Baron, so 1.8/0.9 = 2 buds.

Wrong range

Thanks for being nice about it :D

So your saying the baron should be higher?

i iz confuzzled abou bptf lnguitch

Just re-suggest at 1.6-1.8. That shouldn't be too hard, right?

Yep, I said that, but I didn't look for other sales (it's your job), you should dig more before re-suggesting

I really don't know if dupped items are invalid proof, and the bonk has a 5 months old price (almost outdated, not completely)

Edit : according to the rules "If the hat you are pricing is gifted or duped, you cannot lower the value of its clean version based on its sale. Sales of duped hats can be used as adjuncts or as proof to raise the value on an unusual."

So yeah, like Python said, you can't base a proof on this sale.