Suggestion: Genuine Short Circuit at 2.66–3 ref

Price Suggestion

~41.28 ref

239 votes up

63 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was closed automatically because another price suggestion was accepted instead.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

Selling

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17982644 - 2 ref

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17999327 - 2.22 ref

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17974690 - 2.66 ref

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17824291 - 2.66 ref

Sold

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17937068 - 2.33 ref

Any sales at 3 refs?

If you want unsolds at 3 ref (I'm assuming you're asking this), 3 ref is within range so there is no need disproving that price can be sold by.

No. I am asking whether 3 refs is still possible because he included it in his range.

The suggestion isn't trying to disprove 3 ref. It's trying to prove that 2.66 is within range.

Yes that is right. I am just trying to say that with some links to sales at 3 refs will solidify his evidence to the range. Because if there aren't any links to 3 refs and just basing on the proof here, i can just say that 2-2.66 refs should be the range. Where did 3 come from?

Well if you want to find some sellers and possibly solds at 3 refined, there is a website known as TF2Outpost that you can search for trades on.

For any concern as to what I am on this suggestion, I am parked in neutral.

Really? That website exist? ( Come on, everyone knows that site. I use that site for my suggestions all the time.). There is no need for the insult.

Its not my job to find sales at 3 refs to support the range. The evidence provided is lazy seeing how there are 4 pages on outpost.

As for the 3 ref, you can find some sellers at 2.66 but very little below that (I found 1 or 2 on my own). There are still plenty of sellers at 3 ref on outpost.

Yes plenty of sellers, but are they successful? If they are not successful, then 3 refs shouldn't be in the range. If they are, then it can be in the range. If you get what i mean.

Also, why are you getting negative points? I see nothing wrong with you're saying.

Well probably from those upvoters that do not look at the evidence.

I agree with that guy. I just can't reply to him anymore. :(

First 2.66 link is badly bumped and young

Second link is unbumped for 4 days

And you only have 2 links for 2.66. Downvote, you should know better

5 Links of Proof.....

And also, I couldn't agree more with aaroncsn. You should honestly support the 3 ref included in your range. It would not only make your proof better, but make it look better, to those who just randomly vote based on how many links there are.

I don't understand your range at all...

L 2 and 3 are poorly bumped

L4 hasn't been bumped in 4 days

a lot of these are kinda young, except the 4day unbumped [ http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17824291 current], since they were only bumped for 7hours (?) (CURRENTLY showing 15 hours unbumped -> probably cause sleeping)

I will say, i think i know why some of these are being sold for so low (I sold for 2.22 Ref) People on market are selling for 51¢ to 60¢ so i quicksold them for 2.22 to make an easy 6¢ profit, and i completely agree because these are HARD to sell, even for 2.22 it took me a while to sell them