Suggestion: Vintage Respectless Rubber Glove at 2–2.66 ref

Price Suggestion

~24.77 ref

1324 votes up

323 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was closed Sat, 01 Mar 14 19:48:30 +0000 by A Distinctive Lack of Vincent.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

2 month old price.

Sellers @ 2:

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17877376

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18168519

Sellers @ 2.33:

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18002649

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18050864

Sellers @ 2.66 aren't provided since its still in range

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17877376 Never bumped.

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18168519 Young.

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18002649 Bad bumped.

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18050864 9 Views on 5 days. One is yours, other is mine, and another bp.tf user.

Unsolds for 2.66 will be very helpful, because your proof is very weak. Downvote for now.

First link is never bumped and 1 week old basically, second is less than a day old.

Need better proof at 2

There are 5 pages of seller,20 in four pages,17 in 1 page(Final page).This means there are still 97 sellers,and a lot of solds.You need more proof.Also 2 ref is kinda like a quicksell for me.

Downvote.

A great majority of the rubber gloves are painted and cannot be used as proof.

Out of the 97 sellers, only maybe 30-40 are valid. (And that may be an overestimate.)

Knavesmith is right, majority of the rubber gloves are either painted or odd leveled, They cannot be used as proof.

Not want to lie,you are right.But 2 proof?!This is not exceptable as you said 'only maybe 30-40 are valid' .-. 2 is not enough,please dont make stupid comments and give me a chance.There are still lot of sellers,this suggestion created 5 days ago,maybe more at that time.Still downvıte for me,but i dont want to say anything to you,you can upvote or anything else.

I was actually pretty off.

http://www.tf2outpost.com/search/196204132

1.5 pages of people selling non-painted gloves but that doesn't filter out the special leveled ones. If you do not take into account the trades selling special leveled ones, then you only have about 10-15 valid trades, which makes 2 links look fine. However, not all of these trades may be selling within bp.tf's range so there may not actually be that many valid trades.

I wouldn't call my comment "stupid" since it helps justify the amount of proof given along with this comment. However, your comment is unnecessary since it doesn't really contribute to the suggestion.

2 links still bad bro.If you think when theres less sellers in outpost it doesnt make 2 links are too bad.And 10-15 are valid,then select all of them.So,your comment is unnecessary,while mine is not.10-15 is enough.In outpost theres just 8 frying pan sellers.5 of them selling for 100 buds.Now you can use this as a proof.Just,just go and learn how to make good comments.

Good job at completely ignoring everything except "10-15 valid trades" in my comment. If you had read a little past that, you would have read

"However, not all of these trades may be selling within bp.tf's range so there may not actually be that many valid trades."

Maybe you should learn how to properly make price suggestions before telling others to learn how to make good comments.

You are so boring,but intellgient too.I like playing tf2 instead of doing comments.You are not newbie,so,Cya!You will solve it,but im not in game from today.bye

Glad to know I won a pointless argument on the Internet but I just wanted to mention that quantity isn't the problem in this suggestion. It's actually quality. Refer to my other comment near the bottom of the comments section to see what I'm talking about.

What with its history of dropping price, I still don't see enough proof to warrant a change in price.

Your new suggestion need's to be the "Trade Price" bother buyer's and seller's. * Only Sellers* * Young/Non-Bumped Trades* With more proof provided with your suggestion I see it going somewhere, but for now I have to Down Vote :/

At the time of this post...

Link 1 was closed due to inactivity

Link 2 has been sold

Link 3 is still selling

Link 4 has been sold

If you can find another 2.33 ref seller that's still selling and has been open for at least a day while being bumped, then you could probably resuggest with a 2.33-2.66 range.

Regardless, this suggestion is unlikely to pass. Downvote.

hey

awesome very wow

The proof for the 2 refined low range is just too weak, with one of the only two trades being so insufficiently bumped that it was automatically closed. I would recommend resuggesting with 2.33-2.66 ref.

Closing due to insufficient evidence of low range.