Price Suggestion
Collector's Boston Basher
Submitted by Rα1ɳ
~70.5 keys
Collector's Boston Basher
111 votes up
21 votes down
Advertisement
Related Suggestions

This suggestion was closed by neverclever.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

    Counter Proof

    http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18094772 Unsold for 5 days at 5 keys

    http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18034620 Unsold for 1 week at 5 keys

    http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17888271 Professional killstreak unsold for 2 weeks at 13 keys.

    http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17868776 Unsold for 2 weeks at 8 keys

    Eh, I'll stay neutral.

      Im suggestion a price for a item with no price.

      I can only use sales. And killstreak items don't count.

        Maybe not necessarily counter proof, but i for one think it would be odd to set the price at 10-15 keys when 5 keys doesn't even sell.

          Well I didn't make the rules....

            The rules are pretty clear - you need current sales; If there are unsolds selling lower than your suggested price - perhaps a pointer than your proof may not be recent - as as such - inaccurate

        - Good Counter Proof of current market

        - Sales are pretty old - Recent sales are needed

        - If a Professional Killstreak is unsold for 13 Keys - furthur indication that the suggested range is inaccurate at the current time

        - Credit where credit is due - Good Counter Proof


        DOWNVOTE

          I agree, if the B/O is lower than the sales, and even those aren't selling, there's a problem.


          Range is too high downvote from me.

        http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17543997 15 Keys I think he sold it for less because they guy who sold it for 10 keys bought it.

          two of those are 4 weeks old,the other 2 are 2 weeks old, just sayin' bruh

            And? They are collector items..... Even like a month is acceptable.

            Market can change a lot in a few weeks, especially with collector items and their waning hype.


            I agree with the counterproof; this is clearly too high