Suggestion: Zepheniah's Greed at 1.33–1.66 ref

1.33 sells extremely fast. It shouldn't even be in the range, but, as you can see, I only have a single sale at the high-end. And I'm sorry for that. If more people were to sell at 1.66, they'd be able to get it. But, unfortunately, people always ask for "backpack.tf" even if it sell in a couple minutes (tee hee). Any Extra Proof/Cunter-Proof/Opinions/Tips/Help is all welcome. Thanks for reading. Feedback is always appreciated.

Buyer at 1.66:

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/14588706

Sorry for straying but why do you ask for "cunterproof" in most of your suggestions?

Upvoted BTW.

only one trade, off classifieds for the highend? i know proof is rare, but there has to be more. look at some of the paint resellers

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/12227690 - Recent adds for Greed at 2.66 ref

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/12871000 - Out of stock at 2.33. One recent comment about was 23rd

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/2990647 - 2 recent adds for Greed. One 2.11 ref offer.

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18232200 - 2 willing people in a day to do 1.44 and one willing to pay 1.55

iunno

Why add 1.66 to the range when you have 0 proof for it? Above 1.33 you only have 1 link and that is 1.44. So with only 1 link of 1.44 you are adding 1.55 and 1.66 in range. No logic. Just 1 link is not enough proof to add the 1.44 to the range let alone above. Have to downvote due the really bad proof bro.

Did you even fucking read the sales at 2+ ref I posted 2 days ago? And Michael's trade buying at 1.66 ref?

1.33 sells so quick, it shouldn't even be in the range. But with the majority of sellers at that price, it has to be

First 3 links are 7 months, 8 months and 1 year old for gods sake. Trades to old and can't be used as proof. Btw they highballed that long ago and changed prices god knows how many times. They still have a ton of unsolds and even the ones they sold took them months to sell. Only "fresh" proof if I can call it, was the forth link which took a whooping 6 days to sell and that was bought by ... hmm interesting Michael Puddington ( paint reseller) the same guy that changed his price during this suggestion to be the missing 1.66 proof/buyer you were lacking cause increasing paint prices does not benefit the paint sellers/hoarders, right? Still bad proof is bad proof and no need to use foul language.