Suggestion: Genuine Widowmaker at 0.66–0.88 ref

Price Suggestion

~1.05 keys

211 votes up

101 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was closed Mon, 10 Mar 14 05:38:23 +0000 by neverclever.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

6 valid sellers on the market. Most of them are poorly bumped.

Just noticed the drop a few days ago... well.

Sold:

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18375178 for a s. Jarate and 4 scrap to my knowledge (about .77) Sold in 5 hours

Seller:

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18308740 Ignored 2 offers at .66 though he hasn't bumped the trade in 2 days

Buyers:

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18048778 .66

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18378977 .66 (young)

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18338676 .66

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17721848 .88

None on Bazaar or Classifieds

just an update, banana's offer seems to have been accepted, see item history for one of the widowmakers (see the link below)

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18308740 Ignored 2 offers at .66

No solds other than one?

There are a couple closed trades at .66. But I didn't add them here because they were irrelevant.

Well it seems .66 is QS, all your .66 buyers have not bought any by the looks of their packs either, as well as your .88 buyer.

None of the trades I bookmarked are closed. Besides, I would think that would be a good thing if it was a quick sell.

feeling iffy on this high end of .88, proof is lacking for it

Feel free to counter-proof.

for what? I'm saying you don't have enough proof .-. I'm not here to disprove the suggested range, I'm here to say you're not even proving it

Did you look at outpost before you said that?

what relevance does this have? you haven't provided enough proof in my opinion, doesn't matter if the range is accurate or not, you have to prove it here :|

edit: alright if you'll understand this better: your high end proof consists of a buyer at .88, who appears to have not been successful. thus, the high end range proof is sorely lacking

How is buyers at .88 not proof?

Buyers:

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18048778 .66

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18378977 .66 (young)

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18338676 .66

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17721848 .88

buyers you say? you show one...

The fact that people are buying for backpack.tf price (with the intention of resell for higher) means that a bump may be necessary.

Psst, disliking all of my comments as far as I'm concerned only conveys immaturity in my opinion. Just saying

ah they might (probably are) be planning to resell for higher, but again, your proof for the high end is one failed buyer link :| we're not here to speculate prices

psst, disliking the comments that make no sense (for example the one where you say "How is buyers at .88 not proof" comment has no backing since you only have shown ONE not multiple)

Less than a page on outpost, lots of KS asking for silly prices.

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18199505 unsold 1.11

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18471802 & http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18418413 unsold 1

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18465967 Unsold for .66

The buyer for .88 doesn't have any in their pack despite several add comments. A single person doesn't define the market, and the sheer number of alleged adds indicates they are paying too much.

Most of the trade.tf sales above current price are steammarket, which really doesn't translate well to item item prices.

Without more evidence I don't see enough reason to change the price.