Suggestion: Collector's Splendid Screen at 7–8 keys

Price Suggestion

~100 keys

207 votes up

11 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was closed Sat, 08 Mar 14 01:50:57 +0000 by [GIRL] Mr. Bucket.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

Sellers -

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18025620 - 7

Probably changed it from 8? Not sure, making this with a range since a few 8 on market.

- Considered this suggestion a couple of hours back

- Decided against it when I discovered that the user has a private Backpack and a Private Profile

Are we allowed to use links from such traders? - Downvote?

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18149036 - sold for 7 (from last suggestion)

A bit surprised by the fact that the trade was treated as 7 Keys by the previous suggestor.

Not exactly sure whether it was sold for 7 or 5 Keys

Even the admins were uncertain:

- http://backpack.tf/vote/id/530994aa4cd7b8d1418b45bb

- http://backpack.tf/vote/id/530ea0204dd7b831708b4568

Last accepted suggestion* I mean.

Mhmm, didn't check the last 7-8 suggestion, hmm. Seems like there is some proof for 7 (or less) tho.

Only 1 unbumped link. I realize there are a few, but I don't think your proof is enough for a suggestion. Please gather a bit more before, there is no rush.

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18149036 - QS for 5, had it up for 7

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18025620 - 7, 2weeks, just haven't bumped it in a day. Not unbumped - perhaps just poorly bumped lately :P

QS's don't count. The second link is the same one. Poorly bumped indeed.

He was trying to sell for 7 but failed - Yepp QS for 5, and not in the range :P

Yepp but there's a difference between not bumped and poorly bumped ^^

Hardly, 3 days since a bump is just as bad as unbumped. Closing because of this