Suggestion: Summer Hat at 54.6–60.06 keys

Price Suggestion

Summer Hat

Submitted Sat, 08 Mar 14 16:44:52 +0000 by ★ _zuR

63.5%

48–59 keys

54.6–60.06 keys

~143 keys

167 votes up

96 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was closed Tue, 18 Mar 14 12:57:27 +0000 by A Distinctive Lack of Vincent.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

Proof:

Sold in a week for 60 keys: http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18257073

60 keys = 3.08 buds

Me chatting with him: http://prntscr.com/2z0o6s

-----

Sold in 5 days: http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18351830

I payed 54 keys + 4 ref

4 refs = 0.56 keys

54 keys = 2.77 buds

54.56 keys = 2.8 Buds

Inventory history: http://prntscr.com/2z0rt9

Actual screenshots please

ok, hold 5-10 minutes, i'm posting

So he had a b/o of 3 buds = 3 buds, not 3.1.

Also why are you not listing the sale that happened below your suggested price?

"1st link was sold with 4 keys for a max head

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18201313

So that's 2.55 buds"

everybody said its not actual, and a mod closed the vote with 60% positive votes.

And, 60 keys = 3.08 buds

the system counted only as 3.1 buds. If you have a problem with it, add brad pitt and talk about the system he developed.

That was your 4th link which sold several months ago, this link is only 2 weeks old. And 60% is a low number of positive votes.

Or he could have just paid 3 buds, that was his b/o, no sale should be valued higher than the b/o.

UPDATED: Removed writed chat and inventory history.

Added screenshots of both.

I think the current range is fine. Every clean summer hat that I've ever bought was at 2.5, including two of the more recent ones (the first one in your proof I used to own :0). Sales are a bit slow for this hat, and there are also a lot of duped floating around, but 2.5 - 3 buds is still pretty accurate.

dont think so, 2.5 would be a duped clean, gifted or quick-sell.

Except that's false. Both that I got for 2.5 bud were non duped, non gifted, and were not QS. Demand isn't strong enough yet to wipe out 2.5 as a valid part of that range: you're demonstrating two sales that were already a part of the old range basically. I would try 2 or 3 sales alone just to prove the bottom range, not 1 each

well, it needs sold. The "range" you mean, was the MAX (3 buds), to be accepted is has to be sold. so it was sold for this price, its the range. ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

You're not proving that 2.5 doesn't happen, or that 2.8 happens more. You took two sales that fit the old range, and you haven't shown why the old range is incorrect. You need more proof

Guess ur mad because you used to buy quick-sells and sell for more. Am i right?

I could still try that, even after this price suggestion. Changing the price by .3 buds wouldn't do a damn thing if I were trying to flip these still. Instead of finding more proof for 2.8 (which is what a good suggester would do), you're doing this.

Get more proof for this suggestion. You were told this in the prior suggestion that failed, you came back and didn't change a damn thing. You did what, get a screen shot or two? That's still not showing more sales of 2.8, or showing 2.5 not happening. Get better, and stick to proof over worthless comments

--> OK <---

The trade was clearly valuing buds at 20 keys each. There is no need for the 3.1 bud high range, the trade was very clearly valued at 3 buds by both traders. Further, a recent significant trade is being ignored, as pointed out in the comments. Between these issues and the conflicted votes, suggested range is not acceptable.

Closing.