Price Suggestion
~11 keys
kill-a-watt
Unusual Tartan Spartan Kill-a-Watt
56 votes up
51 votes down
Advertisement
Related Suggestions

This suggestion was closed by polar.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

Some guys who sold it some time ago:

Just me :/ S> Demo unu: How much do u value it ?

Graham: I dont remember what I sold it for but KaW has gone down so I would price it at like 5 or 6

Graham trade: http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17768608


Just me :/ S> Demo unu: How much do u value it ?

RO Iulian: i sold it for a cloud 9 cloud crasher

RO Iulian: so probably around 11-12 buds

RO Iulian: by my vision, if you find a demo player, he might like it much and pay around 12 in unusuals, maybe you'll get 8 in unusuals if you're unlucky, depends on the offers as well and on other sellers' offers

Just me :/ S> Demo unu: So, for u it's around 8 to 10 could be ?

RO Iulian: Probably yea

RO Iulian: but 9 seems kind of a more fair price to me

RO lulian trades: http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/16599460

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/16656335


Some today's trades: http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/16678478 (asking for 9 buds)


http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17835797 (asking for 9 buds too)


http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18456087 (Quickselling for 6.5 pure or 7.5 in unusuals)


The best offer for it, in my opinion is: http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18433301


Ty for ur time!

    Any proof of it being sold in your new suggested range?

      I have 1 that's already there.... the lulian ....

        You need at least 2 to price it.

          in your suggested range though

            I have either.... the guy who sold it for me was for: My Cloud 9 Cold Killer, that I and other guys valued around 7 - 8 buds, and he added around 0.7 buds.... so..

              and 6.4 flies out of nowhere, also I suspect you didn't calculate overpay?

                I put it 6.4, cause the guys who I talked with valued it a, 5, and the other 9, it's around 7 (9+5/2) so, I thought about 2 prices (the lowest one, and a highest one that give me a final result of 7 too)

                  "it's around 7 (9+5/2)" <- don't get this, 7 isn't 9+5/2 and 7 x (9+5/2) doesn't fit anywhere in this discussion (implied "x" for multiplication of 7 times stuff in parentheses) :u

                  and what I am understanding is that you have a guy valuing at 5, one at 9, and you're placing your range in the middle of that with no solid proof for either end .-.

        I would suggest starting with ctaft hats or even just simply vote on prices before you start doing these. It is almost like manipulation because you own this hat and you have no proof of this new range.


        Neutral for now.