Well aren't you a bucket of fun? I never told him to make it 1 scrap flat right away, I told him to see if there were sales at .22 first. No need to insult because someone disagrees.

Comments from the initial 0.11 Ref - 0.22 Ref Suggestion ( http://backpack.tf/vote/id/5330a7644cd7b8693b8b456b ):

Curly Brace: With so many unsolds at .22, why still include it in the range?

Planaris: Sellers are still capable of selling at that price, I think.

Curly Brace: It's a giant wall of unsolds. If you can back it up with successful sales, then I'll upvote. Until then, I'll have to disagree.

Planaris: I found 1. http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18245422

But yeah, I will give everyone a moment to downvote this suggestion before I suggest again.

.

Who suggested 0.11 Ref Flat?

- Conservative Bumps are usually better, especially in this case due to the large number of sellers at 0.22 Ref

- Curly Brace raised a valid point: "With so many unsolds at .22, why still include it in the range?"

- The user further stated that they'd support the suggestion - based on proof (sales at 0.22 Ref): "It's a giant wall of unsolds. If you can back it up with successful sales, then I'll upvote. Until then, I'll have to disagree"

- Suggester was unsure: "Sellers are still capable of selling at that price, I think

- Suggester decided to close the suggestion, on their own volition, as they believed that that there was insufficient proof to back their range (sales at 0.22 Ref), and then opened up a suggestion at 0.11 Ref: "I found 1 (Sale).....But yeah, I will give everyone a moment to downvote this suggestion before I suggest again.

.

Current Suggestion

As far as the suggestion is concerned:

- Proof of sellers at 0.11 Ref provided

- Proof of sellers at 0.22 Ref provided

- Would be better if more proof of sales at 0.11 Ref and 0.22 Ref were provided

UPVOTE