- Forums
-
Pricing
- Community Pricing
- Pricegrid
- Spreadsheet
- Browse Suggestions
- Latest Changes
- Unusual Pricelist
- Browse by Item
- Browse by Effect
- Steam Community Market
- Market Pricelist
-
Trading
- Classifieds
- Classified Listings
- Utilities
- Calculator
- Premium Search
- Statistics
It's not about what you know, it's what you can PROVE.
Last suggestion ALMOST made it! Let's try again.
First off, as you can see, the range needs to go.
SOLDS @ 4.66 :
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18787350
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18787225
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18782919
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18778450 -4ref
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18774065
Unsold at 4.66:
http://tf2tp.com/trade.php?trade=10070929
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18788811
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18778676
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18773595
Unsolds over 4.66 :
http://bazaar.tf/trade/446155 - 5.33
http://bazaar.tf/trade/674908 - 1 Key
http://bazaar.tf/trade/733377 - 5
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18739254 - 5
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18797607 - 5
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18785714 - 5
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18727249 -5
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18786495 - 4.88
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18301881 - 5
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18793886 - 5
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18772787 -5
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18797928 -5
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18733703 -5
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18754284 -5.33
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18776649 -5
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18644025 -5
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18782709 -5
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18751185 -5
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18781673 -5
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18772967 -4.88
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18679517 -1 Key
90% of the ones for 5ref & above are over 3 days old.
http://backpack.tf/classifieds/search/id/52d1d1804cd7b807268b4567/1
I'll leave it in your hands. Please vote based on proof and feel free to add!
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18785714 - is actually asking for 5.33
www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18786495 - under a day old.
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18301881 - sold (check item history)
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18793886 - 10 hours old.
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18772787 - has comments about sending trade offers and "i'll trade", only 1 day old. starting to disbelieve "90% are over 3 days old"
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18797928 - 4 hours old.
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18754284 - 2 days old, wants 5 not 5.33
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18776649 - 1 day old.
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18644025 - very poorly bumped judging by 13 views in a week.
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18782709 - 1 day old
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18751185 - 2 days old
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18781673 - 1 day, badly bumped.
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18772967 - 1 day old
soooo yeah you have a shit ton of young links at 5, 90% are younger than 3 days old. seems like 5 takes a while but can sell.
http://www.trade.tf/trade/531624686
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18761824
5 ref, sold.
http://www.tf2outpost.com/backpack/508225
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18767799
5 ref, not in the user's backpack
http://www.tf2outpost.com/backpack/319435
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18767774
same deal, 5 ref, not in the user's backpack
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18770852
sold for 5, check the history.
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18773890
sold for 5.
that's already more valid solds in the last day than the total of valid unsolds you've provided.
C-C-C-COMBO BREAKER!
OLD PROOF (Since that's what you want)
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18758805 -5ref ; 2 Days
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18674308 -5ref ; 6 Days
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18613487 -5ref ; 1 Week
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18691104 -5ref ; 5 Days
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18688674 -5ref ; 5 Days
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18701491 -5ref ; 4 Days
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18711819 -5ref ; 4 Days
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18647184 -5ref ; 1 Week
I could go on but there's no point.
As to your 'solds' for 5ref.. There is not a SINGLE comment or 'offer' made. If there was, it was done directly/verbally. You can't say it was 'sold' for that price just because it's gone from their backpack now.
Thank you for the additional research and please feel free to review mine!
You realize sellers can restock, right? Also, for god's sake, look at your links before you post them. Half of them aren't bumped for almost 6 days.
yeah i want "old" proof because if I put a trade up 10 seconds ago, it can't count as "unsold", think about it. to be a valid "unsold" it has to have exposure to the market, not be either too new to have sold yet or too hidden and unbumped to see any action.
also comments saying: "i added you for this at this price" aren't necessary, simple as that, if someone puts it up on outpost for a certain price, then closes the trade/the item leaves their backpack, it is assumed to have sold for that price, as long as that price isn't clearly ridiculous. i would estimate that when i sell items on outpost, 80-90% of the time I don't get a comment when someone buys something from me, which is why it isn't necessary for proof, because you'd be discounting almost all of your available sales.
as for your new "old unsolds", they're probably unsold because they have either never been bumped or clearly very poorly bumped and thus get no exposure, and therefore aren't valid as proof that it can't sell for 5. all those trades prove is that 5 ref doesn't always sell without a bump. hardly "clearly must be removed from the range" proof.
Thanks for responding, I've been waiting for you.
Neither you nor I are responsible for lazy sellers, not everyone can afford premium services, I get that.
You are welcome to your opinion as am I. Coming onto MY suggestion disrespectfully because you are upset that there are lazy unbumped trades?
The only bumping I'm responsible for is my own sir.
PROOF POSITIVE that there are a MULTITUDE of low end sellers, not even considering sales below 4.66. I opened this suggestion simply to take away the range, I can open another one to lower it because not even the 4.66's are moving fast enough.
Dunno what your problem is bud, but we'll leave it to the voting.
you're not responsible for other people's trades, but you are responsible for how you use them as proof. I'm coming onto 'YOUR' suggestion critically, and calling you out where your proof is simply invalid, and counterproving that 5 ref can and does sell, because that's how this site works.
You can be all huffy about how it's YOUR suggestion, but it's a suggestion that's on a COMMUNITY website. I'm not upset that there are unbumped trades out there. I'm upset that you are using them in a misleading way to suggest that 5 ref isn't possible, because they clearly don't prove that. I don't know what your problem with me is, perhaps you feel I'm being harsh, but this personal "ooh you're being mean" stuff is just boring. Show me better proof where 5 ref isn't a viable price and I'll be happy to support your suggestion.
S'all good bruv, just weird that your jimmies were all rustled.
Sold one for 5.66
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18805919
http://puu.sh/7KwDP.png
http://imgur.com/STKhSgz another sold for 5
I don't see how unsolds at 5.33 or 1 key are going to help you any, unless you're trying to disprove that it needs a raise, which of course you are not. Those extra links are bugging me. Way more then they should...
help.....
Understandable, and thanks for the response.
I'm simply showing that the item cannot fetch more than 4.66 in the current market atm.
Cheers!
Im not sure most of your sold seems like a q.s and http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18778676 is actually sold, not unsold
39 minutes ago, man time flies. My apologies about that one :)
Man i hope this passes. I made the last suggestion but what I'd reccomend is getting some buyers. Here's my link, i'm buying for 4.55 and have bought 3 so far
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18228060#latest
so you're quickbuying :u ?
Still sells at 5 ref, as demonstrated in the comments.
Closing due to counterproof in comments