Suggestion: Strange Sydney Sleeper at 0.33–0.66 ref

If more proof is needed that this item is no longer worth .66 there are still pages and pages of unsold sydney sleepers on outpost, not to mention the almost 4 pages of unsold sydney sleepers (most of which are under .66) in the classifieds.

Sellers for 0.33?

Just a tip, now that there's stranges in chemistry sets.. you'll rarely see a strange going for 0.33.

Also they sell regularly for about 0.66 on steam market

Times a-changin'

most people are selling them for 10-17 cents which is pretty much the range im proposing

Problem here is you need to follow the guidelines, how do you know it doesn't sell for 0.44-0.66? You need to accompany those unsolds with sellers for 0.33 and prove it doesn't insta-sell

Steam market is not usable since people overpay there sometimes

From my friends experience on crate 30, quoting the price ranges from the market doesn't suffice as evidence for BP price proposals. Even if they are above or below your proposed range.

http://backpack.tf/vote/id/532b2ea34dd7b80a2c8b4568

The price does need a drop, but you don't have any sellers for below the price.

Old story

@gree with the price

NOT @gree with the proof.

SOLD MINE FOR 1 REFINED

http://imgur.com/05z5Qqe

NO SALES FOR PROOF = NO EVIDENCE = DOWNVOTE

Unsolds cannot justify the price drop. 14 links out of 20 + pages of outpost trades isn't the whole picture. For all we know, they have not been online to sell their items (which is my situation of only a few hours a week to trade).

In fact, unsolds CAN justify a price drop. as i said there are pages and pages of unsolds on outpost AND the classifieds, so clearly something is wrong here. the fact that you sold ONE for a high price is nowhere near close enough evidence to counter the fact that its NEARLY impossible to sell one of these for 66.

Without sellers at 0.33 ref, it doesn't belong in range. Unsolds are not valid proof for an arbitrarily lower price.

Closing for insufficient evidence of low range