Suggestion: Strange Rocket Launcher at 4.66–5 ref

Add: Now before you go on and say all of your 4.66 are young and shizz please notice the amount of sellers below 5 ref. Anything below 5 might sell fast but 5 ref is having trouble as well. This is a conservative bump Too hard to ignore the constant 4.66 - 4.88 sellers

Feel free to hate, support or give good counter-proof.

~~~

Thanks to all supporters, moderators, haters, highballers, lowballers, fires, water and Aliens obviously.

Sellers:

1. 2hours

2. 3days

3. 3days

4. 7 hours

5. 2 days

6. 3 hours

7. 11 hours

8. 9 hours

9. 7 hours

10. 16 hours

11. 2 days

12. 1 day

13. 4 weeks (poorly bumped)

14. 4 hours

Solds:

1. Sold without a bump

2. Sold without a bump

3. Sold without a bump

4. Not been sold

5. Sold without a bump

6. Sold without a bump

7. Sold without a bump

8. Sold 7 hours or less after opening trade

9. Sold without a bump

Overall, proof at 4.66 looks young, and the solds seem to be quicksolds. Staying neutral until the unsolds either sell or remain unsold for longer. (apologies for the large post, but it looks neater this way)

Yet, there's a huuuuge chunk of sellers at that range that they consume the 5 ref sellers. Quicksales, young trades or not 4.66 ref has become part of the common trade point and needs to be included.

I believe you didn't read what I said.

"Now before you go on and say all of your 4.66 are young and shizz please notice the amount of sellers below 5 ref. Anything below 5 might sell fast but 5 ref is having trouble as well. This is a conservative bump Too hard to ignore the constant 4.66 - 4.88 sellers"

I did read what you said at the bottom, I just don't agree, though that is only my personal opinion and is only relevant as far as my vote. And since you didnt put young or unsold or poorly bumped next to your own links since you clearly know that many of them are based on what you said, I felt the need to so other voters had the weaknesses in your suggestion fairly highlighted.

What I said probably wont stop your suggestion from being accepted, but criticism of ALL suggestions is a good thing, irrespective of whether or not they're going to be accepted as it encourages people to make them as solid as possible. I hope you understand this. Best of luck with your suggestion.

Yeah, I didn't mind your comment at all. I am always open to criticism. I knew someone or many would go against it because of young and how quickly they sells but looking at the amount of sellers below 5 ref can not be ignored. Like SSJG said "young trades or not 4.66 ref has become part of the common trade point and needs to be included." bp.tf is after the most common trading point and the amount of 4.66 - 4.88 sellers are too high to ignore even though they sell fast. Thank you for checking all the links though and the criticism. ^_^

Good proof. Took me a week to sell 2 at 5 ref.

Upvote.

c-c-c-c-combo breaker.

Definitely needs a range, upvote from me!