Suggestion: Strange Part: Kills with a Taunt Attack at 1 key

Conclusion: Those are all of sales in Outpost. If you want quick-selling proof at 0.9, I can't provide them because no one sells this lower than 1 key (Go and check yourself, you will see). Many sellers are selling it at 1 key (and succeed) while I can't even see one selling under this price. If 1-key is so common, why do we need 0.9 as low-end if it rarely happens?

Feel free to counter / support my proofs.

Only like 4 of your apparent solds are actually "sold". There just B/O that have not been bought. Also Most of the other trades are B/O as well.

The range at the moment fits and I don't think it needs a change. Sorry,but down vote.

Most of them are sold though

I do believe all of my solds are sold. Check their backpack, history list is wierd sometimes and doesn't show the new owner.

And no, the current range is not fine at all. It's nearly impossible to buy one at 0.9 key. I tried at least :P

I apoligize if many are sold. That remark they have been too soon. But if you tried and bought at 0.9 you have, considering you have 3 of them. But if you did buy for a key to try and resell at 1 key,1 ref then that makes no sense as this price would not help that.

I did buy them at 7.44 and resell them for 1 key so I don't have to directly buy keys from other people (I don't like to make key's price rise)

And if I do this suggestion for profit, then 0.3 keys is sure a huge profit for me

That's a lie because you have a classified for 1 key 1 ref. Also I'm staying downvoted as the proof is not sufficient. Sorry.

Only sell 1 to test my luck, not them all

While my real trade is here: http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/19139034#latest (Yes, this part is not the only part I use to buy keys)

But anyway, argue about how much I'm selling this part ain't the purpose of comment section. If you want to debate more, add me instead of spamming here.

" the proof is not sufficient"

Mind to tell why and counter instead of just saying?

Fair. I'm going to be neutral on this one though. Still not sure it needs a bump.