Suggestion: Vintage Community Sparkle Lugermorph at 510.9–541.13 keys

Price Suggestion

~4225 keys

sparkle

39 votes up

14 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was accepted Mon, 14 Apr 14 16:08:44 +0000 by Puddilicious.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

Disclaimer

This price suggestion is only based on Clean Lugermorphs with short history. The price of any dirty Lugermorphs (or clean Lugermorphs with long history) should be de-valued from this base price accordingly.

Basis

There are very few clean Lugermorphs with short history left in existence, and even fewer available on the market. Recently, there was a relative outburst of two listings, and both trades were completed this past week.

Trade #1: [url]http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18534552[/url]

Sold for 27 buds + 15 keys (~27.75 buds)

At least one known collecting offer of 27 buds

Trade #2: [url]http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18445312[/url]

Sold to me for 22 buds + 76 keys + bill's hat (~26.2 buds)

At least one collecting offer of 27 buds with longer collecting timeframe

Cash inquiry by reputable trader for $900 - $1000, but no deal because seller prefers buds

Back-up pure offers of: 25 buds, 20 buds

Problem with your [/u] just letting you know :P

fixed, thanks! :P

Those are based on clean sales.

Hi it's my first time making a price suggestion - is it incorrect to base prices on clean items?

No, you're supposed to only use non-duped sales. The part with the short history I don't really know anything about.

I would say roudning to 26-28 would be better but this is good enough, upvote :)

Good enough, must be fixed.

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/19066945

sold the 13 bud.

duped and/or long history

That's a mass duped. gg

Demm...

thank you for actually having clean proof for once :P

anyways, 26-28 would be better, as the price is just an estimate on the high tier items, and aren't meant to be exact

Is it possible to adjust my pricing suggestion at this point? Or does that require an entirely new submission?

you'd have to close and remake the suggestion

In that case I'll keep the current suggestion as is then, since i don't think it's enough to justify an entire re-vote just to shift the lower/upper bounds by 0.2 buds.

Rest assured though that I'll keep your advice in mind and use whole numbers for future pricing suggestions.