Suggestion: Burning Flames Respectless Rubber Glove at 64.8–90 keys

Price Suggestion

~140 keys

burning

243 votes up

26 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was marked as bad price range and closed Mon, 12 May 14 11:47:58 +0000 by Horizon.

The price range was either too broad or did not accurately reflect how the item was traded. Therefore, this suggestion has been closed.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/19088429 - B/O of 5 buds and sold for Miami Honcho's (4 buds) [Offer Value: 3.5 buds]**

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/19448187 - B/O of 5 buds

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/19448187 - Sold for Lantern Jefe and he added a N&B Modest (6-1.9=4.1 buds) [Offer Value: 3.7 buds]***

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/19204674 - Sold for Beams Bombing**** + Secret Dogger***** if he added Nuts Modest (4.8+2-1.9=4.9 buds) [Offer Value: 3.9 buds]

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18300982 - Sold for G. Fetti Anger + 2 buds (5.7 buds) [Offer Value: 5.2 buds]

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18542416 - Selling and most likely sold for 4 buds

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17926733 - Sold for Disco Triboniophorus Tyrannus (6 buds) [Offer Value: 5.4 buds]

** - http://backpack.tf/vote/id/535f7f714dd7b88b578b4a5c

*** - http://backpack.tf/vote/id/534987234cd7b8e61b8b4998

**** - http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18375164 - Beams Bombing sold for Vivid Sensei (Sensei had B/O of 2 buds) and 'Quicksold' for 2 buds http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/19519222

***** - http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/19174335 Secret Dogger sold for Terror Company Man (5.3 buds) [Offer Value: 4.8 buds] http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/19133587

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/19588857 - Sold for 4 buds

downvoting due to

1) too wide a range

2) link 1 - one ill-advised sale does not a price make, it was clearly regreted on link 2 as seller tries to get it back :D

3) link 3 - Jefe is listed as 6.1 price not 6, but even then it has a wide range, debatable worth as a reference (a Jefe has a rejected ~6.7 buds offer here http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/19550943)

4) link 4 - how does this work? "=4.9 buds) [Offer Value: 3.9 buds]" - - 20% is subtracted, you subtract 10% on the others?

5) i own one :p

The guy who sold it for a Miami Honchos tried to get it back because I made a suggestion for the Honchos and it got accepted at 3.5-4.4 buds, he didn't get the profit he wanted.

The link to that 6.7 bud offer on the Jefe isn't working and there is a mini scale difference between 6 and 6.1...

I discounted 20% because there are two Unusuals

Link not working? Search on the lantern Jefe, there's not many.

"I discounted 20% because there are two Unusuals" - please think about that again, that logic seems a little messed up. Are you saying that 10 unusuals will have zero value?

working link http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/19550943

- as all the 3 lowest of your links seem 'of dubious worth', your research kind of says the lower price should actually be raised :D

what you just said sunk in, please correct me, but it appears like you are knowingly mis-leading people?

Link1 -> (your main evidence for this price-range widening...)

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/19088429 - B/O of 5 buds and sold for Miami Honcho's (4 buds) [Offer Value: 3.5 buds]**

- - when that offer was made the Honcho was at 4.4-6.1= 5.25 and you appear aware of that fact.

- - you then voted the honcho down and used its NEW price as evidence to an offer made BEFORE that price was accepted

as i say, please do correct me as i would not like to associate deliberate dishonestly to someone not deserving.

I made a simple mistake of discounting both Unusuals and then adding them together. Even I admit it. Though it still doesn't hide the fact that two Unusuals sold below 3.9 buds. I say that because:

1. If by the 6.7 offer you mean the pot, then that's basically invalid considering that it was priced 11 months ago and the hype was still there when it was priced. We also know that most new effects dropped down drastically afterwards.

2. There was no price for the Miami Honcho before I made one. I made that one first then made this so that it could be included in range. So that whole paragraph you said about me being 'mis-leading' is in itself, ironically misleading.

So 'please do correct me as I would not like to associate deliberate dishonesty with someone not deserving'.

Thanks for the clarification, so it's only 2 of the 3 lower range items that can be totally discounted :

link 1) you applied a value onto an item which was NOT applicable as the time the offer was made

link 4) you applied double you're own 10% value deduction (that's assuming that it's accepted that even 10% deductions can be applied)

DOWNVOTE remains

I agree with the high end, but not the low end. The lantern jefe has a very old price, and the recent price suggestion didn't pass because of the large deviation in sales. The honcho's is correct, but it may be an outlier. I think something like 4-5 might be slightly better...

Agreed, both 4 pure sales went fast.

Well yeah cleaning up, closing this, feel free to resuggest at 4-5.