- Forums
-
Pricing
- Community Pricing
- Pricegrid
- Spreadsheet
- Browse Suggestions
- Latest Changes
- Unusual Pricelist
- Browse by Item
- Browse by Effect
- Steam Community Market
- Market Pricelist
-
Trading
- Classifieds
- Classified Listings
- Utilities
- Calculator
- Premium Search
- Statistics
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/19395072 bought for 3 buds
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18184408 sold for 3
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17836759 sunbeams Glennary bonnet 3 buds w/ overpay
all the clean sales I could find
Upvote, since the Glengarry is not outdated :)
obviously quicksolds..
Then why do they take weeks to sell?
Because they do not quicksell ^^
The ones that sell for 3 pure I mean
Because he was maybe trying selling for more and decided to quicksell it.
B/o for 4.5 http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/19467701 unsold for 5 days
Strife bought it in a bulk sale and so did donger and so did Jojo and so did Yazeed. That was one of the clean ones on the market
the second clean one is the one I used all the sales for including that b/o I linked you to
The third clean one hasn't sold in a year
First trade, the 3 bud offer was made less than 2 days after the trade was posted. So it didn't even get to DAYS plural for 3 buds to be offered, let alone weeks.
Hard to tell when the second trade sold, but it's very obvious they edit their notes. You should probably ask him how long he had it listed at 3 buds instead of assuming it was "weeks". Personally I made new trades for this reason, no one ever considers that the trade notes can be changed, even when its painfully obvious like in this case.
--Also, this same guy got a 3.7 Bud offer one month ago here: http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18188925 . This is the second trade on his OP trade history. Same guy who offered that offered a Burning Rack (9-10 Buds) if the guy added 3.5, which is either a 5.5 or 5 flat offer, depending on how you calculate overpay for it.
The third trade is a link to a Bonnet trade and none of the offers include a Stuntman. Although, since the guy who traded away the Stuntman for the Bonnet did not open a trade for said Stuntman, it's likely that overpay is not needed. The Stuntman was probably offered on the Bonnet, making this trade 3.25.
However, the only decent offer I see is here: http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/19498420 (Dazzar's offer), but all the hats are unpriced so it's useless. This hat probably does need a drop, but I'm not sure about 3 flat.
Ok first piece
wasn't listed as a qs still sold for 3 pure so its not a quick sale
Second piece of counter proof you said against me you said that it got an offer of 3.7 pure, he retracted so that can't be valid
Third one for the bonnet check the history and there is no proof of it being offered or not so overpay is still put on to it
And your 4th link is a link to a duped one and that can't be used as proof and those hats imho aren't even 3 buds put together
-If you define quicksell as a trade that says "quicksell" in the notes, I have bad news for you. Quicksells are determined by time, not some dude saying "iz gud deel, buy eet nao" or something.
-The trade owner declined a 5 bud offer after overpay, and since Holy Shit is an active trader, I wouldn't rule out him getting another hat and no longer having the pure.
-History is terrible to determine trades. You have no idea what may have been added, all we know is that the trade had those two hats in it.
-It wasn't supposed to be proof, I even said that it was useless. I was just posting it because it was the only decent offer I saw.
Quicksales are determined by time, but if there are sales that happened at that range, it isn't a qs
Holy shit may be an active trader but that doesn't mean he has pure at all times, in his backpack right now he has no pure, hell, im probably as active as him and 90% of the time I have no pure
-History is a great way to determine it and even if things were added it would seem like small items were added if anything
-That sense sentence no makes.
-I uh.....I know this. Mostly because I already said it, but whatever. You seem to have missed the point of what I said entirely.
-History proves that they did trade the bonnet and stuntman. It doesn't prove that 1)The bonnet was offered on the stuntman (which you're assuming in your proof) or that 2)nothing else was added.
Checking their bp histories (something that you should have posted, since it is actual proof. The bonnet trade is not actual proof and is basically worthless), it seems that it was a 1:1, but assuming the Bonnet was offered is still stretching it.
Duped. All duped. I will add this to the mini-suggestions thread for duped hats, if you don't mind, so your work won't go to waste. Sorry