Price Suggestion
Strange Part: Heavies Killed
Submitted by Avery
~5.67 ref
Unique Strange Part: Heavies Killed
14 votes up
26 votes down
Advertisement
Related Suggestions

This suggestion was marked as bad evidence and closed by A Delicious Cashew™.

There should always be enough evidence to back up the new proposed value. However, it appears that the evidence is not strong enough, or cherry-picked in a way that does not represent the actual market value of the item. Therefore, this suggestion has been closed.

Message left by moderator:

Bad evidence as shown by the comments and no proof for the highend of 3.33. Please put more effort into suggestions in the future.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

Solds are nearly impossible to find due to small market of under 10 trades total. Those that are sold are usually used right away or simply rot in backpacks. Conservative bump based off of tons of people offering higher than 2 ref.


Yes, I own a lot of these.


Suggesting 3 to 3.33 since 3 ref is rarer to be seen, but still able to be gotten, and the higher end due to the rejected offers.


Shoot me, this isn't perfect but it's far better than the current price.


Offers:

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15130991 -rejected 3 ref pure

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/16433376 -rejected 3 ref pure

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15130991 -tons of offers at 2 ref, not taken

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/14928920 -rejected 2 ref offer

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18625347 -rejected lots of 2 ref offers


Solds:

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/9478379 (4 ref, guy at the bottom)

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/19365646 3 ref sold


QUICKSELLS:

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/19597053 has 3 buyers for his heavies part at 2 ref within 21 hours of putting up the trade, with 0 bumps. That's a definition of a quicksell, right there.

Here we go again...

Link 1: Offer wasn't rejected, the seller is never online.

Link 2: 1 Month old.

Link 3: Months old offers and seller is never online.

Link 4: Those are very very outdated.

Link 5: Seller is never online.

Link 6: He didn't buy it.

Link 7: Still has it.

Link 8: Still has it.


Proof is atrocious, range is made up, obvious price manipulation as always as you have admitted it. Instant downvote.

      This isn't price manipulation, just changing the price to what it should be.

        "QUICKSELLS:

        http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/19597053 has 3 buyers for his heavies part at 2 ref within 21 hours of putting up the trade, with 0 bumps. That's a definition of a quicksell, right there."


        No he doesn't. He has 1 visible buyer and the other 2 didn't say they wanted the Heavy Kills part.

          My bad, still a quicksell with that one guy, however.

          Both "solds" are to the same user, which doesn't seem to have any of these parts in his BP. Downvoting due to no proof of 3.33.


          Edit: Actually not seeing any sold for 3 ref, never mind 3.33 ref.

            What do you suggest I make the range, then? Hard to make a range with less than 15 trades on outpost.

              1st person has a buyer at 3 ref

              Second one is a quicksell

              high end from nowhere, downvote

                so wheres your highend from?

                  " higher end due to the rejected offers."


                  Seems like owning 120+ of a certain item screws up your suggesting knowledge.

                  As said many times before, you need proof of your high end (solds/offers at 3.33 ref)

                    Going along with the train here, but they're right, you don't have any actual proof of 3.33, so I'll have to downvote.