Price Suggestion
Strange War Goggles
Submitted by ★ Scary Johnson
92.21%
0.8–1 keys
6–7 ref
13
~3.5 keys
Strange War Goggles
225 votes up
19 votes down
Advertisement
Related Suggestions
...
100%
4.8–4.85 keys
3.3–3.7 keys
ｄｅｌｌｅｒ
100%
3.75 keys
4.8–4.85 keys
car
96.77%
3.1 keys
3.75 keys

This suggestion was marked as bad evidence and closed by A Distinctive Lack of Vincent.

There should always be enough evidence to back up the new proposed value. However, it appears that the evidence is not strong enough, or cherry-picked in a way that does not represent the actual market value of the item. Therefore, this suggestion has been closed.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

The last suggestion didn't have any evidence of .8 keys (6 ref), but whatever.


Barely any on the market, most want ridiculous prices (or in other words, slightly above backpack.tf value)


7 ref:

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/19194496 26 days


1 key unsolds:

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/19567862 1 week

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/19575420 6 days

Avatar ★ Scary Johnson · posted

    The 6 actually came from 1 classifieds seller.

    Avatar ★ knavesmith · posted

      Good to know, I still don't think classifieds counts as valid evidence though. I guess I'll wait to see if they want me to resuggest then.

      Avatar ★ Scary Johnson · posted

      you need proof of 6 ref solds seeing as its in your range

      Avatar ★ Viper · posted

        Taking low end from last suggestion.

        Avatar ★ Scary Johnson · posted

          6 ref was already in the range. He doesn't need to provide proof for it.

          Avatar ★ knavesmith · posted

            still need it

            Avatar ★ Viper · posted

            Actually why not? What if it isn't accurate anymore?

            Avatar ★ Hugh Jazz Mann · posted

              Feel free to provide counterproof if you believe 6 refined shouldn't be in the range.

              Avatar ★ knavesmith · posted

                No I was asking you a question not disputing with this price.

                Avatar ★ Hugh Jazz Mann · posted

            also solds are for raising (usually), technically only needs 6ref seller(s)

            Avatar ★ Vrakos Anthrakir · modified

            I don't believe the issue of old low range being assumed to still be valid has ever been properly discussed before now.


            http://forums.backpack.tf/index.php?/topic/10725-low-end-when-lowering-a-price-high-end/

            The community has discussed it here as a result of these suggestions. The consensus is that it is important to re-establish the low end if the previous suggestion was not been recently made. I can't think of any reason myself why that shouldn't be the case.


            Closing for insufficient evidence of low range.

            Avatar ★ A Distinctive Lack of Vincent · posted