Suggestion: Time Warp Hottie's Hoodie at 94.5–124.25 keys

Multi-hat trades involving 4 or more hats should be avoided when pricing unusuals unless the suggestion is for a high end hat (worth >10 buds). Basically, if a hat is a small piece in a large deal, that sale should not be used as proof.

Yeah, I was aware of this, thought I'd give it a shot anyway.

Excluding the Arcana Wet Works sale this is the mini-suggestion from, the only real traceable sales are these ones.

Figured it was better'n nothing.

If anyone can wrangle any extra proof, that'd be fab, otherwise...

[redacted whinging bitchyness]

Sorry if you feel offended. I am sure you have read it. Its just that if i don't post it there, some other voters will think that what i said is just without any base if you get what i mean?

Yeah, fair enough, no worries :3

I fuckin' love Time Warp, probably as much as you love Arcana. It's a shame I'm not rich enough to own a Time Warp hat, though.

Anyways, I don't see anything wrong with these trades. I've done a suggestion that got accepted with a sale involving 3 hats plus an Australium ([url]http://backpack.tf/vote/id/535eb90e4dd7b8b3558b48c7[/url]), and I don't see why sales of that caliber should be discounted as long as all the hats are up to date.

Well, I believe the thinking is they may not be valued to their full potential, some of the value could be used as 'sweets' or some sort of 'bulk deal' mentality works. Were there other sales I would use them, but this thing is 1 of 1 and this is literally all I could find.

both are bulk deals which shouldn't be used as proof. There is way too much room for error. For example, a Miami TC is probably no where close to 18, and the viewfinder may be under 20 by now. As stated in the rules, this shouldn't be used as proof.