Price Suggestion
Kill-a-Watt Wraith Wrap
Submitted by ★ dr1ftec
86.29%
n/a
71.4–76.5 keys
6
~34 keys
kill-a-watt
Unusual Wraith Wrap Kill-a-Watt
107 votes up
17 votes down
Advertisement
Related Suggestions
Tim Payne
95.45%
11–16 keys
34 keys
Scourge
96.19%
17–22 keys
11–16 keys
Headshotdoge
95%
22–33 keys
17–22 keys

This suggestion was accepted by A Delicious Cashew™.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

So few recent sales. Overpay calculated.


Sales

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/19689145 - sold for aces modest pile of hats ~5*0,9 = ~4.5 ( http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/19705108 )

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18609777 - sold for blizzardy storm fro (~1.4) + dp attendant (~3.2) = ~4.6*0,9 = ~4.2 value of the hats used that was closer at the moment of trade ( http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198086791794?time=1396477533 )


Avatar ★ dr1ftec · modified

    http://backpack.tf/stats/Unusual/Demoman%27s%20Fro/Tradable/Craftable/36

    Steaming Fro valued at 16 - 20 keys. 18 keys is a perfect bud, not 1.4.

    Attendant has an outdated price.

    Avatar ★ ManOfMystery · posted

      1. Especially for you I've written "value of the hats which was closer at the moment of trade" (after your previous same comment on my other suggestion). 2 months ago attendants price wasn't outdated.

      2. If you had tried not to spam through my suggestions and to look a little bit more attentively at proof, you would have noticed that the price of fro is fine. Because I meant Blizzardy storm fro.


      Nope, it's price is not outdated and wasn't outdated at the moment of trade as well.

      Avatar ★ dr1ftec · posted

        I'm sorry but modifying your notes and claiming that you had it written correctly the first time is just low on so many levels.

        1. The trade was done 1 month ago: http://backpack.tf/vote/id/52ac578d4dd7b871558b4568 . Backpack.tf prices go out of date in 3 months... therefore the price was outdated during the time of trading

        2. You wrote "Steaming" in your notes, why else would I have provided you with a Steaming Fro link.


        Your argument is invalid.

        Avatar ★ ManOfMystery · modified

          Again. If you had looked through the links I provided instead of blindly commenting, you would have pointed out that I was talking about blizzardy storm fro and I just mistyped the name of effect. But you're trying to correct the price instead of the name of effect you were supposed to see in the proof links.


          Secondly, the trade was completed almost 2 months ago - on the 2nd of April. And again you could had pointed that out if you would have looked through my proof links.

          Avatar ★ dr1ftec · posted

            I looked through them, but I'm not going to look at every single detail. We can take your Attendant trade at 2 months ago, it is still outdated seeing as its suggestion is 5 months old.

            It was my fault to not look closely at the first link yet I don't appreciate your hostility.

            Avatar ★ ManOfMystery · posted