- Forums
-
Pricing
- Community Pricing
- Pricegrid
- Spreadsheet
- Browse Suggestions
- Latest Changes
- Unusual Pricelist
- Browse by Item
- Browse by Effect
- Steam Community Market
- Market Pricelist
-
Trading
- Classifieds
- Classified Listings
- Utilities
- Calculator
- Premium Search
- Statistics
This 10 months old price clearly needs some fixing.
Selling:
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18971222 - Wants 1.5 buds - unsold for over 3 months(has re-listed it in 4 trades over 3 months)
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18920446 - Wants 1.5 buds - unsold for over 1 month.
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/19523714 - Wants 1.7 buds - Unsold for over 3 weeks.
Sales:
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17894477 - Sold for 22 Keys(about 1.2-1.3)
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17854651 - Sold for either 23 or 25+ some ref(price is unclear, couldn't contact the guy)
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17812334 - QUICKSOLD for 20 Keys.
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/15691899 - Sold for Steaming Luchadore(~19-22 keys) + 3 keys + 2 ref.
If you want me to provide fresher sales, sorry, there are no fresher sales.
Reason I think this is a reasonable price is becuase there's 2 sellers with SOME unusual offers close to their B/O, and all solds are 1.2-1.3(exept the 1 quicksale).
Three 3 month old solds and one 5 month sold. They are much too old to be used.
Why do you keep commenting and try to counterproof absolutly ALL suggestion I make?
And no, their not to old to be used aslong prices are fixed.
I have nothing against you, but you're making incorrect price suggestions.
Read the rules first: http://forums.backpack.tf/index.php?/topic/6033-new-unusual-price-suggestion-guide-the-cheat-sheet/
The first point: Sales older than 2 months old are not valid proof; this does not mean that they are not useful. Feel free to include them to provide supplemental proof. Just don't rely on them to set your range.
Yea, and, no sale proof is actually needed aslong as I am lowering the price, so your statement is pointless.
B/Os alone cannot be used to make an unusual suggestion. Just like we don't like to use offers as the only proof to raise the value on an item, we don't like using B/Os alone to drop the value as this has frequently caused bp.tf to lead the market with consecutive suggestions every 1-2 weeks dropping the hat (see Miami Wraith). This also creates an issue when future suggestions use those values as proof when they are still inaccurate.
Have you read the rules or not? At least try to take in criticism instead of acting so hostile.
i priced this solely on b/os :)
http://backpack.tf/vote/id/5370b71e4dd7b8a25d8b4aa9
(assuming there are no sales in the last 2 months of this rag like the conn cap, lol)
Read KaushuMan's post at the end of your price suggestion.
"Exceptions: There are rarely situations where we feel B/Os can be used as the only proof in a suggestion. We will accept such suggestions ONLY if there are literally no usable sales in the last 2 months. In these situations, the suggester must show proof of recent sales and why they are not usable (quicksell, sold for more unpriced hats, etc.). In these cases, there is frequently a large buyer-seller gap and dropping the value based on B/Os might actually result in a few sales that could then be used to refine the value."
This hat has been traded many times in the last 2 months, therefore it does not apply here.
That's KaushuMan, not Woifi
My mistake, still invalid argument.
That was Kaushu, not Woifi.
Fixed that mistake.
'This hat has been traded many times in the last 2 months, therefore it does not apply here."
thats all i needed to know
I replied to your comment before you modified it. I assumed you didn't know before.
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/18971222 - guy has been afk for a month
The other seller isn't bumping much
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/19547536 - sold for b/o - ghosts copper + 3 keys in sweets. Shouldn't be taken more than the b/o of 1.5
Low end is coming from sales that are too old to use. We have 1 sale at 1.5 and two b/os at 1.5. I think 1.5 flat will work here.