Suggestion: Anti-Freeze Bunsen Brave at 78.75 keys

Price Suggestion

~135 keys

anti-freeze

31 votes up

31 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was closed Fri, 23 May 14 21:19:25 +0000 by polar.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

Id like to sugguest this as 4.5, I've had it for a while it will refuse to sell any higher. Its a robo hat, with a robo effect, been offered 3 buds pure on numerous occasions, although the best offer i got was 4.5. Took it today and heres the proof. I don't think this hat would sell for anymore. Its the first to be sugguest, its 1:2 and up to my knowledge mine was the only one in the market.

Heres my proof.

http://i.imgur.com/6Za6Uec.png

I agree with Jimmy Hunter, you do need two sales to price a new unusual hat. Find out if it has been sold again and ask the buyer how much he paid, then ask him to make a screenshot of his trade history, make a price suggestion, and the unusual will be priced. Thanks.

:u the screenshot shows how much the buyer paid, do you mean to ask what fat cat paid?

http://backpack.tf/item/2203129993 hebbe hasn't sold it again :/

You need two sales for pricing robo effects I believe.

http://backpack.tf/rules

Indeed.

You need proof of 2 sales.

Anti-Freeze is a 2013 effect, so you are contradicting yourself by saying he doesn't need 2 sales but 2013 effects do need 2 sales. Also, the trade where FatCat got it is still recent enough for it to be valid proof and should be used in establishing a price.

I don't know why I deleted it.

http://forums.backpack.tf/index.php?/topic/6033-new-unusual-price-suggestion-guide-the-cheat-sheet/

2013 summer effects require two sales while 2013 robo and Halloween effects do not require two sales. Also if you look below, the hat has to be off the market for a certain amount of time in order to be priced with one sale. I would recommend reading the new rules before commenting.

Then say Summer effects need 2 sales, not 2013 when Robo is a 2013 effect. Either way there was another sale in the past 2 months, the sale to him. So unless there is some issue with that sale, it needs to be included.

According to the hat's history: http://backpack.tf/item/2203129993 The hat has no more valid proof available from the 2 month period therefore no more proof can be found. It even surpasses the 3 month period for "rare hats"

Havich's sale is not valid because he's a scammer and you're sort of banned from outpost for having a "shady" business according to Outpost http://www.tf2outpost.com/user/634119

The hat also does not reach the requirements below unfortunately:

Any hat can be priced based on a single sale if ALL these criteria are met:

- There are no other recent sales in the last 3 months

- The effect is not a summer 2013 effect. (robo, 2013 halloween effects can be used as they are often rarely traded and rarely unboxed)

- The hat went to a collector or person who intends to keep the hat. A collector can be identified by looking at the person's trade history, item history of similar unusuals in the backpack OR if the owner has not resold the hat 1 month after the sale occurred.

Cannot say I agree with this.

So there are two recent sales, one sale in which you bought it and the one in which you sold it. Your options are to give this a range based on what you bought and sold it for or to wait for one month to see if it sells again. If in one month, this still hasn't sold, feel free to resuggest at 4.5 flat.