Suggestion: Memory Leak Glengarry Bonnet at 31.83–35.18 keys

Price Suggestion

~29 keys

leak

77 votes up

60 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was closed Sat, 14 Jun 14 03:49:50 +0000 by polar.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

I can't believe that suggestion got accepted. This makes me so frustrated.

This is what got accepted:

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Hey.

5 out there, 1 on market

http://goo.gl/16djAO Wants 2.3

sales

http://goo.gl/CKc2e9 > http://goo.gl/jc3KdN ~2.1

http://goo.gl/vGmvzh > http://goo.gl/qLn4aB ~2.1

http://goo.gl/LCxFHW > http://goo.gl/tqmOG9 ~1.5

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Okay, so what is wrong with this?

Look at the first link. He said that it got sold for a cauldron bubbles hoodie. The guy with the hoodie added about 1.7 keys to the trade (He said it was a 1:1, this puts it at ~2.1 with overpay). http://i.imgur.com/S3b6eld.png

The second link is right (Sold for a miami nights gonzilla, ~2.1 buds with overpay).

The third link says it got sold for a cloud 9 steel toe. This is true, but when it got sold (2 months ago), the price of the steel toe was 2.3 buds (He used the current price, 1.7 buds). This comes out at ~2.1 with overpay.

There is also a fourth sale. I sold the glengarry for an orbiting planets phantom (1.9, no overpay since it was offered on).

http://imgur.com/a/PI2Lx

Summary: three sales at 2.1, one sale at 1.9

For the next time, please look into the suggestions a bit further. I don't want people to get less then what they could've gotten for their unusual just because somoene made a suggestion with false sales.

Get your shit right before talking bad about my suggestions.

-I updated the hoodie price.

-Your 1.9 sale is in my range.

-I used the old toe price/It's in the range

-1.7 Keys would make the sale 2 buds. I still have another highend sale

You should use your brain before making stuff like this.

Go get 'em, Pearly!

Excuse me about the hoodie, updated that one. Comes out at ~2.1 with overpay.

What do you mean? The screenshot of outpost is just too prove that it's the right hat, named "The Daydreamer". If you look too the right of the picture, then there is the actual proof.

The 1.9 sale is just too give some extra proof, that's all.

The old price for toe is 2-2.5 buds (~2.3) 2.3 * 0.9 = ~2.1

Am I missing something here? Sorry if I offended you.

yes you are missing out the lowend and i do not get the point of this suggestion.

The other one got accepted with 100[!]% Positive votes. http://backpack.tf/vote/id/538888a04dd7b8f42b8b4583

Do you seriously think this would have passed through, with 100% upvotes, if it wasn't 100% correct?

Well, I got all proof needed to change the price. The low end that you used was ~2.1 buds at the time that the sale happened.

I'm guessing that people are too lazy to check the proof. I might be wrong but I'll guess that we'll see :P.

And the point is that I think it was an unfair pricing of the hat and therefore I wanted too change it.

Do you really think the mods are too lazy to check proof? ..

Plus, had 90+ suggestions accepted, many of them with the new price used that was made in another suggestions.

Eg, once suggested a GBH[or timewarp idk] Cold Killer, and refreshed 3 more hats for that

Got accepted too, with new price used ofc.

'Twere Time Warp, I remember since it was some of the best suggesting I've ever seen.

Pearly's not one to mess up a suggestion pal. And in my ~120 passed suggestions only one got 100% positive votes. It's practically indisputable, here.

Show me that my proof is incorrect and I'll believe you.

It isn't incorrect, it's cherry-picked. There's a sale at 1.5.

At the time when the sale ocurred, it was 2.1

Alright, I'll let the mods decide on this.

The mods thought it was fine, hence they accepted the last suggestion -_-

Plus 2.1 is in my range, what is your problem?

Yes, but I'm arguing against your low end. You used a price of a sale that happened 2 months ago. The price then changed after the sale and you used the newer pricing even though it was valued more back then. Do you understand what I mean?

Alright we let the mods ~~close this~~ decide then

Alright, thanks.

aw thanks[gent] :3

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/20130240 - another sale under your range

Your b/o on the phantom was 1.8. Since you valued it at no more than 1.8 in that trade, it can't be valued more than that here.

Honestly, if it weren't for this most recent sale at less than 1.3, I might have accepted this suggestion. Given another low sale, I think the previous suggestion range is close enough.